Search for: "State v. South" Results 1461 - 1480 of 11,018
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jul 2010, 12:00 pm by INFORRM
On 7 July 2010, the Supreme Court of Namibia gave judgment in the important defamation case of Trustco International v Shikongo (Case SA 8/2009). [read post]
11 Aug 2012, 10:29 am by Rick Hasen
As to successful § 2 suits South Carolina and Texas are “worse” than Indiana, but all three are below the top ten offenders, which include five uncovered states (Figure V). [read post]
24 May 2011, 7:25 am by Nexsen Pruet
The opinion issued by the Supreme Court of the United States in that consolidated appeal is known as Brown v. [read post]
3 May 2011, 7:08 am by Brian A. Comer
  This is a crane accident case involving a "KCI rubber-tired gantry crane" at a terminal of the South Carolina State Ports Authority in Charleston, South Carolina. [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 3:30 am by Kevin Kaufman
Table 1 shows how each state’s individual income tax is structured. 2023 State Individual Income Tax Structures States with No Income Tax States with a Flat Income Tax States with a Graduated-rate Income Tax Alaska Arizona Alabama Florida Colorado Arkansas Nevada Idaho California South Dakota Illinois Connecticut Tennessee Indiana Delaware Texas Kentucky Georgia Wyoming Michigan Hawaii   Mississippi Iowa   New Hampshire* Kansas… [read post]
15 Feb 2022, 1:55 am by Kevin Kaufman
Table 1 shows how each state’s individual income tax is structured. 2022 State Individual Income Tax Structures States with No Income Tax States with a Flat Income Tax States with a Graduated-rate Income Tax Alaska Colorado Alabama Florida Illinois Arizona Nevada Indiana Arkansas South Dakota Kentucky California Tennessee Massachusetts Connecticut Texas Michigan Delaware Wyoming New Hampshire* Georgia   North Carolina Hawaii… [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 4:02 pm by Amanda Pickens
Not every class action court filing in North and South Carolina becomes a full-length post on our blog. [read post]
26 Apr 2014, 3:54 am by Jeremy Speres
  Accordingly, even though the express provisions acknowledging Presto’s proprietorship of the mark terminated upon settlement, the court still found that reliance on that state of affairs fell short of “the ethical standards of acceptable commercial behaviour. [read post]