Search for: "Sweet v. Sweet"
Results 1461 - 1480
of 1,646
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Aug 2008, 10:28 am
This piece charts the old British Catnic/Improver test against its German counterpart, the Schneidmesser test, with some fascinating results.The Kat was also glad to spot a dissertation by a rather younger friend James Tumbridge (Gowlings) on whether the Canadian Supreme Court has anything to teach the British -- with their tiny quantity of case law on famous marks -- on a subject that will not develop much in this country until the Court of Appeal for England and Wales, armed with the ECJ's… [read post]
19 Aug 2008, 10:20 pm
That's our sweet spot. [read post]
14 Aug 2008, 4:00 pm
LLC v. [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 2:00 pm
On Tuesday, August 19, 2008, PropertyShark.com is sponsoring a Manhattan real-estate networking event at The Madison & Gypsy Tea (27 West 24th Street). [read post]
6 Aug 2008, 5:33 pm
According to the publisher's (Sweet & Maxwell -- or is it Thomson -- or is it Reuters?) [read post]
6 Aug 2008, 1:31 pm
United States v. [read post]
3 Aug 2008, 12:14 pm
(In the following post V. [read post]
1 Aug 2008, 6:07 pm
(This was the exact issue in Morrissey v. [read post]
31 Jul 2008, 12:30 pm
Hoffer v. [read post]
18 Jul 2008, 6:35 pm
Sweet. [read post]
18 Jul 2008, 6:10 pm
In February, we told you about the landmark decision in Berendsen v. [read post]
17 Jul 2008, 10:42 pm
By Eric Goldman Kruska v. [read post]
15 Jul 2008, 12:21 am
First, the TVA v. [read post]
14 Jul 2008, 5:45 pm
I have pasted below the full text of a short and sweet article from the The Orlando Sentinel about how and why mediation works and why you might want to give it a try. [read post]
11 Jul 2008, 5:10 pm
While LVMH has once again experienced the sweet smell of legal success, its dispute with eBay is far from over -- with respect to either counterfeits or unauthorized sales of authentic products. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 9:25 am
Full contents of the current issue can be perused here.Finally there's issue two for 2008 of another Sweet & Maxwell title, the Intellectual Property Quarterly. [read post]
4 Jul 2008, 9:54 am
strikes and you're out - well, we told you so" campaign (see next) and the anti-child porn brigade, it has to be said that the ECD immunities of Art 13-15 - including the requirement that the state not ask ISPs or hosts to proactively monitor or filter in Art 15 - look increasingly like dead ducks.Things look to be going the same way in the US as well, with both the CDA s 230c immunity under fire in the US Tiffany litigation, and DMCA immunity attacked in the ongoing Viacom v You… [read post]
3 Jul 2008, 2:38 pm
William Sweet (A-1-07)/State v. [read post]
1 Jul 2008, 3:39 pm
King v. [read post]
1 Jul 2008, 8:46 am
The case (Freight Drivers, Helpers, Dockmen & Allied Workers Local No. 375 v. [read post]
