Search for: "T-UP v. Consumer Protection" Results 1461 - 1480 of 4,764
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Dec 2018, 5:53 am by Florian Mueller
The key question is now whether a ban of Intel-powered iPhones up to the iPhone X (but not the latest models) will actually be enforced. [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 8:05 am by Bob Ambrogi
v=S5n5ME2yDkU&t=78s Pricing: We have five tiers based on firm size, number of clients using the app, and features selected. [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
  New commercial speech doctrine may also be the demise of a law passed recently to protect consumers from misleading claims about supposedly low-risk tobacco products. [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 5:31 am by Barry Sookman
. _________________________ I am a Senior Partner in the technology law group of McCarthy Tétrault. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 4:09 am by Edith Roberts
Pepper, in which the justices considered whether iPhone-app purchasers can bring an antitrust suit against Apple for monopolizing the market for the apps and making consumers overpay, and Frank v. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 10:55 am by Colby Pastre
It simply wasn’t necessary to spell that out. [read post]
28 Nov 2018, 1:26 pm by schlangerlaw
Both consumer financial protection statutes provide for damages when these obligations aren’t met. [read post]
28 Nov 2018, 1:26 pm by DanSchlanger
Both consumer financial protection statutes provide for damages when these obligations aren’t met. [read post]
27 Nov 2018, 4:01 am by Edith Roberts
At Bloomberg, Greg Stohr and Naomi Nix report that “justices from across the ideological spectrum suggested skepticism about Apple’s contention that the consumers pressing the suit can’t collect damages. [read post]