Search for: "Tenant v. State"
Results 1461 - 1480
of 3,367
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Feb 2015, 4:47 am
It has ruled on what ‘repairs’ are but the judgment will not give many investors clarity over what their rates liability could be during refurbishment works.The case is Newbigin v S J and J Monk. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 4:47 am
It has ruled on what ‘repairs’ are but the judgment will not give many investors clarity over what their rates liability could be during refurbishment works.The case is Newbigin v S J and J Monk. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 4:24 pm
BAKER, Appellant, v. [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 8:39 am
Hansen In Donahue Schriber Realty Group, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 2:47 pm
I am thinking here of Spencer v Taylor (which we analysed here), Charalambous v Ng, and now Edwards v Kumarasamy. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 9:19 am
In weighing Augustus v. [read post]
8 Feb 2015, 9:01 pm
” In Brinkman v. [read post]
8 Feb 2015, 11:59 am
MR v North Tyneside Council and Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (Housing and council tax benefits : other) [2015] UKUT 34 (AAC) The FTT in this case had found that the tenant was entitled to an ‘extra’ bedroom, as under a shared residence order, her son spent alternate weeks with her. [read post]
8 Feb 2015, 7:18 am
Akhverdiev v Azerbaijan 29/1/15 On 8/10/05 Mr A acquired ownership of a property in Baku, Azerbaijan. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 11:19 am
Idle-O Apartments v. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 6:09 am
Moon v. [read post]
5 Feb 2015, 8:22 pm
Queens Probate Attorneys in Azzara v. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 1:27 pm
As an illustration of the perils of a claim in nuisance, here is Yianni v Shakeshaft [2014] EWCA Civ 1639 [Not on Bailii. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 10:28 am
Additional Resources: Budzko v. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 11:51 pm
As a landlord or letting agent you probably thought: That landlords are not liable to keep in repair external areas such as gardens, communal halls and pathways, and that The landlords are not liable until they have been notified of any repair issues by the tenant However a new Court of Appeal decision, Edwards v Kumarasamy , now says that these views are wrong. [read post]
31 Jan 2015, 6:29 am
In the recent case of Ruiz v. [read post]
25 Jan 2015, 10:32 am
The first standard applied, the Cronic standard (from the SCOTUS ruling in United States v. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 7:05 am
In Grand Prospect Partners, LP, v Ross Dress for Less Inc., Ross was negotiating with a shopping center owner Porterville, in Tulare County. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 2:03 pm
It provides subsidies to the tenants and bonuses to landlords that will accept those tenants. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 5:00 am
App. 1942) (landlord not liable for injuries suffered by a tenant who inserted a finger into an electrical socket) Meehan v. [read post]
