Search for: "Test Plaintiff"
Results 1461 - 1480
of 21,972
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jun 2020, 5:02 am
[Ninth Circuit allows plaintiffs to challenge California statute that bars students from attending some for-pay trade schools unless the students have a high school diploma, have a GED, or can pass a government-prescribed test.] [read post]
13 May 2011, 11:21 am
On appeal the plaintiff argued that the court should adopt an “economic reality” test based on whether the labor in question involves a “service,” such as the janitorial chores performed in Henthorn, or rather involves a “good,” such as the making of clothes performed by the plaintiff. [read post]
10 Sep 2021, 7:36 am
“[G]iven both parties were competitors, it is reasonable to infer that an allegedly false statement based on allegedly faulty testing comparing Defendant’s product with ‘similar products,’ could damage competitors, like Plaintiff. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 9:20 am
The expert conducted some tests on the very same deck the plaintiff slipped on, although the tests were not performed until roughly a year and a half after the accident. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 7:51 am
” The employer may then seek to justify its refusal to accommodate the plaintiff by relying on “legitimate, nondiscriminatory” reasons for denying her accommodation. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 7:51 am
” The employer may then seek to justify its refusal to accommodate the plaintiff by relying on “legitimate, nondiscriminatory” reasons for denying her accommodation. [read post]
23 May 2012, 5:25 am
The plaintiffs contended that Mr. [read post]
19 Sep 2012, 4:24 pm
They were participants in the first plaintiff's verdict in the country involving transvaginal mesh. [read post]
19 Aug 2020, 7:40 am
The plaintiffs were awarded over $2.9 million. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 1:18 pm
It will offer testing options and second opinions for those who currently have none. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 2:00 am
”[xvii] Without specific guidance on which additional tests may be applied, the Federal Circuit once again looked to the machine-or-transformation test and merely paid lip service to Bilski v. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 4:30 am
Several district courts in the Fourth Circuit, however, have used the localization test. [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 8:30 am
Explaining that a test applied by a magistrate judge in deciding whether a Title VII plaintiff’s hostile work environment claim was time barred erroneously relied on a now-discarded analysis focusing on when a plaintiff was on notice to file suit, and that the judge consequently failed to consider the full range of alleged harassment that could support a female math professor’s sex-based hostile work environment claim under the continuing violations doctrine,… [read post]
22 Sep 2017, 5:46 am
Speaking up about the corrupt testing process in his school was part and parcel of his job duties, that is, "ensuring the fair and proper administration of a test for which he he had some responsibility. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 6:31 am
Nathan granted in part defendants' motion to dismiss plaintiff TufAmerica, Inc.' [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 8:00 am
Under the test set forth in S.G. [read post]
25 Nov 2020, 5:48 am
After lunch on Nov. 9, the judge advised the jurors and attorneys that a juror who had recently been excused tested positive for the coronavirus.The judge then suspended the trial and asked participants to get tested and provide the court with results as soon as they were received. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 7:48 am
In this case, the plaintiffs argued the traffic stop was too long, in violation of the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 9:34 am
In the law it's the "but for" test and for our purposes then the courts tend to attach legal liability (assuming the existence of a duty and its breach) only upon the following: had Defendant done otherwise, Plaintiff would today be uninjured. [read post]
2 May 2024, 5:00 am
In this regard, the court stated that it had concluded that the Defendant employer did not meet the second prong of the test set out in the case of McDonald v. [read post]
