Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Price" Results 1461 - 1480 of 4,402
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Aug 2016, 3:41 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  But the firm’s interest is in creating positive/bottom-line maximizing info, not accurate representations of quality, price etc. [read post]
14 Jul 2019, 8:58 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Teaching 100 percent of the cases on people kicked by horses will not convey the law of torts very well. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 9:22 am by Eugene Volokh
For the view that Harisiades gives the government nearly unlimited immigration power over aliens, see Price v. [read post]
28 Jul 2017, 3:54 am by SHG
The Seventh Circuit’s Hively decision cracked the wall of precedent that held sexual orientation was not covered by Title VII, though the argument is that the Supreme Court’s 1989 decision in Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
14 Oct 2015, 11:13 am by Lyle Denniston
  If, as many signs indicated, the Court winds up splitting four to four in Federal Energy Regulatory Commission v. [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 10:00 pm
Ten Reasons Why You Should Teach Here — And Three Why You Shouldn't (v. 3.0) 1. [read post]
29 May 2011, 3:05 pm by Andrei Mincov
As long as competitors are not precluded (either through violence or through operation of law) from entering the market, there is nothing wrong with companies having monopolistic power based on their ability to offer to consumers something at such a price that no competitor can match. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 2:06 pm by Bexis
  Pioneer manufacturers that have long since ceased making or selling a product end up saddled with liability that can only be recouped by raising the prices of other, unrelated pioneer products. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 10:48 pm by Florian Mueller
I do know that a lot of people in different places were very surprised when they felt this year that my tone had changed. [read post]
10 Sep 2016, 2:16 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
But you can overstate the degree of what’s learned v. social. [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 5:17 pm by Larry
Take, for example, Roe v. [read post]