Search for: "USPTO"
Results 1461 - 1480
of 16,127
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jul 2024, 3:09 pm
Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) Director Kathi Vidal published a Director’s blog post today addressing the Office’s current backlog of patent and trademark applications, which the latest USPTO data shows to be 785,387 unexamined applications/ 25.6 months total pendency for patents and 14.5 months total pendency for trademarks. [read post]
11 Jul 2024, 3:09 pm
Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) Director Kathi Vidal published a Director’s blog post today addressing the Office’s current backlog of patent and trademark applications, which the latest USPTO data shows to be 785,387 unexamined applications/ 25.6 months total pendency for patents and 14.5 months total pendency for trademarks. [read post]
2 May 2024, 5:15 am
Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) recently released new guidance for practitioners using artificial intelligence (AI)-based tools. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 12:48 pm
Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), on the eve of a Senate Judiciary Committee vote on her confirmation. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 5:30 am
The post Does the USPTO have authority to address patent eligibility in Covered Business Method review? [read post]
29 Aug 2009, 7:54 am
On August 24 the USPTO published interim guidelines for its patent examiners on patent-eligible subject matter under the Bilski case. [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 1:24 am
A press release on 29 July from the USPTO notes: Margaret J.A. [read post]
USPTO to allow accelerated examination for "green" applications without examination support document
8 Dec 2009, 7:32 am
However, the USPTO anticipates extending the program if it is successful.For USPTO the press release, click here. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 7:22 pm
In the USPTO release, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property... [read post]
7 Feb 2010, 9:32 pm
Extension of Period for Comments on Enhancement in the Quality of Patents In December 2009, the USPTO published a notice in the Federal Register seeking public comment on the enhancement in quality of patents. [read post]
21 May 2010, 2:21 pm
” Additional information the Green Technology Pilot Program page on the USPTO’s Web site. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 9:12 pm
Bahr, issued a memorandum to USPTO examiners regarding the Supreme Court's recent Bilski v. [read post]
9 Oct 2007, 8:14 am
Constraints on the USPTO's ability to limit continuations In both the proposed rules and the final rulemaking, the USPTO acknowledges the right to continuations under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
13 Nov 2007, 8:34 am
Perhaps the USPTO's parent agency, the U.S. [read post]
5 Aug 2014, 4:13 pm
The following guest post comes from USPTO Commissioner for Patents Peggy Focarino and is a re-publication of what Commissioner Focarino published on the USPTO Director’s Blog. [read post]
4 May 2007, 3:41 am
The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) is seeking comments to obtain the views of the public on international efforts to harmonize substantive requirements ofpatent laws, and any potential subsequent changes to United States law and practice. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 10:15 am
This week in Other Barks & Bites: The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) notifies 61,000 trademark applicants of a data breach; USPTO Director Kathi Vidal admonishes VLSI; and the European Patent Office (EPO) announces a 2.5% increase in patent applications. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 10:15 am
This week in Other Barks & Bites: The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) notifies 61,000 trademark applicants of a data breach; USPTO Director Kathi Vidal admonishes VLSI; and the European Patent Office (EPO) announces a 2.5% increase in patent applications. [read post]
9 May 2012, 11:24 am
By Dennis Crouch Under Director Kappos' tenure, the USPTO has focused on reducing the backlog of unexamined cases. [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 5:00 am
On May 10, 2024, a proposed rule, introduced by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), regarding the use of terminal disclaimers to obviate nonstatutory double patenting rejections was published in the Federal Register. [read post]
