Search for: "United States v. Article of Drug" Results 1461 - 1480 of 2,497
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Aug 2018, 9:01 pm by Thomas Greaney and Samuel R. Miller
The United States is unique among developed nations in relying on case-by-case court decisions to develop its competition policy. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 12:36 am by David Kopel
 In a state v. state case, a state can assert the interests of its nationals. [read post]
21 Dec 2020, 11:56 am by Phil Dixon
(1) Despite the State’s repeated use of “moped” to describe the defendant’s vehicle, sufficient evidence existed to establish that the defendant’s vehicle met the statutory definition of “motor vehicle”; (2) New trial required where trial court plainly erred in failing to instruct the jury on the definition of “motor vehicle” State v. [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 9:44 pm
" (3)However, some nations such as the United States of America (USA) and the United Kingdom (UK) have at points sought to make methods of execution less liable to bungling or to inflicting gratuitous suffering. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 4:13 am by Edith Roberts
The first was United States v. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 9:30 pm by Bobby Chen
Supreme Court’s decision in Murphy v. [read post]
19 Jul 2008, 5:54 am
  The Court held that the rights afforded under the state Constitution were more protective of individual freedom from arrest than under the United States Constitution. [read post]
2 Sep 2017, 9:00 am by Michael H Cohen
A medical device is “an instrument, apparatus, implement, machine, contrivance, implant, in vitro reagent, or other similar or related article, including a component part, or accessory which is: recognized in the official National Formulary, or the United States Pharmacopoeia, or any supplement to them, intended for use in the diagnosis of disease or other conditions, or in the cure, mitigation, treatment, or prevention of disease, in man or other animals, or… [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 2:47 pm by Beck, et al.
Microsoft Corp., 309 F.3d 193, 202 (4th Cir. 2002) (“allegations must be stated in terms that are neither vague nor conclusory’”); Browning v. [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 10:02 am by John Elwood
” He got the hint and filed an amicus brief expressing the views of the United States. [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 1:22 pm by Elina Saxena, Cody M. Poplin
As 50 U.S special operations forces arrive in Syria to support opposition groups, the United States continues to pursue “a cease-fire to limit the cycle of killing and the establishment of a timeline for a transition of power. [read post]
27 Aug 2021, 9:03 pm by Karis Stephen
In the United States, multiple federal bodies develop and enforce e-commerce counterfeit goods regulations. [read post]