Search for: "United States v. Article of Drug"
Results 1461 - 1480
of 2,497
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Mar 2013, 12:09 pm
United States. [read post]
16 Mar 2013, 4:58 pm
See that in data privacy—earlier article on this. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 6:47 am
Perry, the case involving a challenge to California’s Proposition 8 banning gay marriage, or United States v. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 9:05 am
United States (2012), to decisions about the safety of medical devices, Riegel v. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 9:25 am
”[12]Article 100 became Article 53 in the current 1984 version of the Constitution, and the language of the article remained mostly unchanged. [13] Article 53 deals with the duties of the citizens, it does not explicitly provide means for the state to exercise judicial authority. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 2:37 pm
Tobacco manufacturers and the United States government: ready for battle. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 2:21 pm
More on Clapper v. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 12:46 pm
In this case, it comes from the Eleventh Circuit, with a special guest appearance from the Court of International Trade.The case is United States v. [read post]
19 Feb 2013, 7:00 am
In United State v. [read post]
15 Feb 2013, 8:01 am
United States v. [read post]
15 Feb 2013, 4:00 am
The generic names, created to allow health workers to talk about the same drug without becoming confused by various manufacturers' proprietary names, are developed, in the United States at least, according to a scheme established by the United States Adopted Names Council [USAN], a scheme they describe as a "logical nomenclature classifications based on pharmacological and/or chemical relationships." [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 1:17 pm
Van Gogh, Pot Pipe, 1887First, it's important to note that at least one recent case, Kentucky v. [read post]
8 Feb 2013, 2:19 pm
There's no indication that he's got any United States v. [read post]
5 Feb 2013, 11:08 am
The authors interviewed 70 IP attorneys, business managers, and scientists involved biomedical research and drug development in the United States. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 2:51 am
The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals recently addressed this issue in the case of United States v. [read post]
27 Jan 2013, 9:01 pm
Ultimately, however, the United States Department of Justice indicted MacDonald, and a jury convicted him after a trial in 1979. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 1:02 am
That means under the United States Code, there are no accepted medical uses. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 1:02 am
That means under the United States Code, there are no accepted medical uses. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 2:06 pm
Rival manufacturer, Flybynight, upon reading the published article, immediately promotes its competing drug, “Almost X,” off label for curing high blood pressure, and gets a huge market share because Almost X is much cheaper. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 4:37 pm
Lori Drew and in United States v. [read post]
