Search for: "United States v. Cores"
Results 1461 - 1480
of 3,566
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Oct 2024, 12:13 pm
AvePoint, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am
As relevant here, the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York denied plaintiff's motion and granted the City's motion for judgment as a matter of law. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am
As relevant here, the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York denied plaintiff's motion and granted the City's motion for judgment as a matter of law. [read post]
24 Aug 2022, 11:18 am
After all, "it is our law and our tradition that more speech, not less, is the governing rule," Citizens United v. [read post]
12 May 2010, 2:09 pm
Roberts became chief justice of the United States, he said that he hoped to emulate the modesty and unanimity of his greatest predecessor, John Marshall. [read post]
23 Aug 2015, 9:08 pm
That has left public-sector unions, representing 35.7% of government workers, to carry the lead banner for organized labor across the United States. [read post]
12 Jan 2013, 10:37 am
In United States v. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 9:30 am
This was set forth in the landmark 1984 decision of the United States Supreme Court in Universal v. [read post]
26 Sep 2007, 8:33 am
As the New York Times sums up the matter: At issue are federal rules that allow insurance premiums to be shifted from the United States to offshore affiliates — which reduces taxes — and allow the proceeds to be invested tax free, increasing the profit to parent companies. . . .The core of the dispute is an unusual tax treaty with Bermuda. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 4:04 am
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES William E. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 7:00 am
Finally, Part V will provide a brief Conclusion. [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 9:47 am
United States, 337 U.S. 293 (1949) (“Standard Stations”) the Supreme Court devised what has become known as the “quantitative substantiality” test. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 1:56 pm
” As we said in United States v. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 9:50 am
District Court for the District of Columbia referenced my most-noted formulation of this principle in a foreign-cubed piracy case, United States v. [read post]
3 Jul 2024, 9:06 pm
United States is one of the Supreme Court's most significant separation of powers cases. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 9:01 pm
” Larson v. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 6:30 am
” In United States v. [read post]
27 Oct 2018, 7:52 am
In A v United Kingdom, the European Court of Human Rights concluded that ‘the broader an [MP’s] immunity, the more compelling must be its justification in order that it can be said to be compatible with the Convention’ ([78]). [read post]
28 Dec 2010, 10:04 pm
Jones, 61 M.J. 80 (C.A.A.F. 2005); United States v. [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court in Montana v. [read post]
