Search for: "United States v. Dollar"
Results 1461 - 1480
of 4,433
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 May 2018, 10:28 am
A Texarkana Court of Appeals case, Petrohawk Properties, L.P. v. [read post]
6 May 2014, 8:42 am
Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> Monroe Energy, LLC v. [read post]
31 Jul 2013, 9:01 pm
In Perry and United States v. [read post]
17 Jan 2008, 4:30 am
Ortiz v. [read post]
31 Jul 2007, 3:21 am
United States, United States v. [read post]
29 Jul 2014, 5:01 pm
Owners were then stuck with the bill of thousands of dollars to replace [it]. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 11:00 am
Co. (1933, Mont.) 26 P2d 175 [periodic immersion of injured hand into hot water]; United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. (1919 Neb.) 173 NW 689 [x-ray procedure requiring injection of contrast substance into the kidney]; Cardinal v. [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 5:56 am
Mayville also gets the law quite wrong: "Meanwhile, voucher proponents were energized by landmark decisions of the United States Supreme Court, most notably Espinoza v. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 6:54 am
" These Elizabethan "poor laws" became the model for the United States’ legislation on the same subject. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 8:48 am
This changed on June 21, 2018 when the United States Supreme Court issued a 5-4 decision in South Dakota v. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 8:48 am
This changed on June 21, 2018 when the United States Supreme Court issued a 5-4 decision in South Dakota v. [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 3:32 pm
[VDARE partly complied with the subpoena, but later sued] in United States District Court for the Northern District of New York … [VDARE Foundation, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jan 2008, 4:30 am
Raspa v. [read post]
24 Jan 2008, 4:30 am
Raspa v. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 12:09 pm
Thomas More Law Center v. [read post]
28 Feb 2013, 10:16 am
The United States has filed an amicus brief articulating OFAC's views regarding two aspects of this case. [read post]
15 Feb 2019, 8:29 am
On Friday morning, President Donald Trump said he would declare a national emergency to allocate more funds to expand walls or barriers at the United States-Mexico border. [read post]
10 Feb 2008, 9:33 am
The Sixth Circuit affirmed a judgment (including attorney's fees) against a father who claimed that permitting a woman, but not a man, to terminate a pregnancy violates the equal protection clause of the United States Constitution. [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 9:33 am
The Sixth Circuit affirmed a judgment (including attorney's fees) against a father who claimed that permitting a woman, but not a man, to terminate a pregnancy violates the equal protection clause of the United States Constitution. [read post]
