Search for: "United States v. Lively" Results 1461 - 1480 of 11,909
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jun 2011, 12:03 pm by Jo-Ann Wallace
  As amicus in the case, The National Legal Aid & Defender Association (NLADA) argued that when the private interest at stake is someone’s personal liberty counsel should be made available to the alleged contemnor in all instances, as is currently the case in a majority of jurisdictions in the United States. [read post]
5 Aug 2016, 8:00 am by Dan Ernst
FailingerDenying the Poor Access to Court: United States v. [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 8:08 pm
That's what today's oral argument in Weyhrauch v United States, No. 08-1196 sounded like to me and others as well. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 12:09 pm by Donald W. Schroeder
In recent years, the conventional wisdom has been that remote employees living in other states throughout the United States would not be able to avail themselves of the employee-friendly employment laws found in Massachusetts (or other states where the workers don’t actually live or work). [read post]
3 Sep 2016, 6:25 pm by The Blog Team
Williams was charged under the  Military  Extraterritorial Jurisdiction  Act of  2000 (“MEJA”),  which  provides  federal jurisdiction  over  crimes committed  by a civilian  accompanying  the  Armed Forces  outside  the United  States (18 U.S.C. [read post]
16 Oct 2020, 8:00 am by ernst
Despite lots of its own inconsistency, the Supreme Court adopted this view in 1866 in United States v. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 8:44 am
When the United States Supreme Court returns from summer break and begins a new term in October, it will have a new Justice and a new, important question to decide. [read post]
4 Oct 2018, 4:23 am by Elena Chachko
As Newstead said: [t]he United States has great respect for this Court. [read post]
It is Congress, not the president, that has the power to “provide for the ... general welfare,” “to regulate commerce with foreign nations, and among the several states,” to appropriate money, and “to make all laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into execution” all “powers vested by this Constitution in the government of the United States. [read post]
11 Apr 2018, 10:25 am by Miriam Seifter
They note that the United States was not a party in the case Washington relies on for the opposite proposition, City of Sherrill v. [read post]