Search for: "United States v. London"
Results 1461 - 1480
of 1,914
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Apr 2011, 12:01 am
Henry v. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 10:15 pm
The United States and Britain (the most popular venue for such cases) have recently attempted to address the issue legislatively. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 4:00 am
As a result, the United States refused to pay KBR, and KBR refused to pay Tamimi. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 2:25 pm
Cooper and Juliette V. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 9:31 am
Colonial archive v. local sites; old works v. present recordings as part of the archive; new relations of control. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 5:13 am
(The claimant had relied on the requirements in Huang v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2007] 2 AC 167 at [19]). [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 3:24 am
liable for contributory infringement, ordered to remove links to infringing websites (1709 Blog) (IPKat) (1709 Blog) Netherlands Dutch Sony seizure dispute: a case for New Amsterdam (IPKat) South Africa Google test pilots its Innovation Incubator program in SA (Spicy IP) Sweden Pirate Bay back up, Pirate Party shut themselves down over server ‘abuse’ (TorrentFreak) United States US General Where’s EFF? [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 1:00 pm
United Kingdom Of Great Britain And Northern Ireland Extradition Treaty, protocol of signature and exchange of notes signed at London on June 8, 1972; Ratification advised by the Senate of the United States of America on June 21, 1976; Ratified by the President of the United States of America on September 10, 1976; Ratifications exchanged at Washington on October 21, 1976; Proclaimed by the President of the United States of… [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 4:48 am
There's also a neat Current Intelligence note by the perceptive Enrico Bonadio (City Law School, London) on the Advocate General's Opinion on what counts as "communication to the public" in the joined cases of Football Association Premier League v QC Leisure, YouTube and Karen Murphy v Media Protection Services Ltd (Joined Cases C-403/08 and C-429/08), which the Court of Justice is going to decide this summer. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 4:00 am
The case of the day United Company Rusal, plc v. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 12:00 am
Supreme Court in the affirmative action case of United Steelworkers of America v. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 11:12 pm
(IPKat) Bavaria, Cumberland benefit from latest GIs (Class 46) Germany Given Imaging obtains injunction against Intromedic in patent infringement suit before Dusseldorf regional court (IP Factor) India ‘Open’ carries a story on the ‘behind-the-scenes’ of the Copyright Amendment Bill, 2010 (Spicy IP) Japan USPTO offers relief to Japanese applicants (Patent Docs) South Africa Geographical terms – Swartland SCA judgement (Afro-IP) The Oilwell valves tightened –… [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 1:58 pm
United States. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 9:43 pm
’ Convergence facts, figures and trends (IPKat) 100 domains on movie and music industry website blocking wishlist (TorrentFreak) Design infringement in the UK: official guidance (Class 99) United States US Patents – Decisions CAFC rejects narrow view of analogous arts test: Innovention Toys vs. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 10:25 am
“The Sarbanes-Oxley Act and the litigious environment are creating a more risk-averse culture in the United States,” one former senior investment banker stated. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 9:01 am
LGBTKF4754.5 .K59Gay and lesbian elders : history, law, and identity politics in the United States / Nancy J. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 3:58 am
Supreme Court in connection with Morrison v. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 3:06 am
(PatLit) United States US Patent Reform US Patent Reform: America Invents Act passes Senate with broad support and status update (Maryland IP Law Blog) (IPblog) (Patent Law Practice Center) Post-disclosure grace period – unique but good policy (Patently-O) What are the provisions of the proposed ‘First-inventor-to-file’ System in S. 23? [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 6:28 pm
United States, 525 F.3d 1149, 1154 (citing Bennis v. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 6:00 pm
In the former case the accuseds’ appeal to London was unsuccessful. [read post]
