Search for: "United States v. Michigan" Results 1461 - 1480 of 3,728
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Feb 2015, 10:11 pm by Jon Ibanez
In Michigan Department of State Police v. [read post]
31 Jan 2015, 8:24 pm
Also in June last year, the United Nations Human Rights Council unanimously approved a parallel project “[r]equest[ing] the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights to continue the work on domestic law remedies to address corporate involvement in gross human rights abuses, and to organize consultations with experts, States and other relevant stakeholders”. [read post]
25 Jan 2015, 8:00 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 105 (MI App., Jan, 22, 2015), a Michigan state appellate court dismissed for failure to exhaust administrative remedies an inmate's objections to a policy change that called for prisoners seeking a kosher diet to receive vegan meals. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 11:15 am by John Elwood
Snyder, 14-571 (Michigan), and Bourke v. [read post]
17 Jan 2015, 9:55 am by Larry Joseph
Virginia decision arose from a criminal action appealed from a state supreme court, and the 2013 United States v. [read post]
17 Jan 2015, 8:52 am by William Eskridge
Evans and continuing through his recent opinion for the Court in United States v. [read post]
17 Jan 2015, 3:13 am by David Cruz
  This suggests that Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Antonin Scalia, Clarence Thomas, and Samuel Alito – all of whom voted to uphold the discriminatory Defense of Marriage Act in United States v. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 12:31 pm by Austin Nimocks
Also significant is the Sixth Circuit’s correct understanding of the Supreme Court’s recent decision in United States v. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 12:30 pm by Andrew Brasher
Perry, but to strike down Section 3 of DOMA as unconstitutional in United States v. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 7:52 am by John Elwood
Snyder, 14-571 (Michigan), and Bourke v. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 4:53 am by Amy Howe
United States and Zivotofsky v. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 3:57 am by Amy Howe
United States, in which the Court held that the federal bank robbery statute’s “forced accompaniment” provision applies whenever a bank robber forces someone to go somewhere with him, even for a short distance. [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 2:54 am by Amy Howe
United States and concludes that “[t]he smart money is that the Court will take Justice Scalia’s suggestion and simply strike the residual clause, thereby leaving only the listed offenses. [read post]