Search for: "United States v. Minnesota"
Results 1461 - 1480
of 1,827
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Sep 2010, 2:30 am
Eight states have rejected mandatory pro bono reporting (Colorado, Indiana, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New York, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, and Utah). [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 9:11 am
Moreover, the Court agrees with the Minnesota Court of Appeals’ reasoning in Ray v. [read post]
25 Sep 2010, 6:59 am
Among other things, sixty-nine percent indicated that the Court “is a crucial governing body for the success of the United States. [read post]
23 Sep 2010, 9:01 am
Thornhill has an extensive track record of successful litigation throughout the United States and, particularly, in the country’s federal and state court systems, including Louisiana, Texas, Mississippi, Alabama, Minnesota, and New Jersey. [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 1:36 pm
United States; Brendlin v. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am
General Motors Corp., 575 P.2d 1162, 1168-69 (Cal. 1978); see State Dept. of Health Services v. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 11:53 am
--Court: United States District Court for the District of MinnesotaOpinion Date: 7/23/10Cite: Drummond American LLC v. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 12:10 pm
Bass v. [read post]
3 Sep 2010, 12:42 pm
§ 2 (2006), by willfully maintaining its monopoly power in the market for the sale of drugs for the treatment of PDA in the United States, and that Lundbeck’s conduct violated state law. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 2:41 pm
We disagree.In Hoffman, the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit applied Pennsylvania law and concluded that there was sufficient evidence for the jury to find that the manufacturer failed to adequately test its drug to discover potentially harmful side-effects. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 5:30 am
The United States District Court for the District of Minnesota agreed with the plaintiffs, declined to exercise jurisdiction, and remanded the case to state court. [read post]
21 Aug 2010, 12:00 am
Before O'Meara's resentencing, the Supreme Court of the United States decided in Blakely v. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 4:36 am
Washington, DC: United States Department of Agriculture. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 4:34 am
Salmonella is one of the most common enteric (intestinal) infections in the United States. [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 12:55 pm
On July 23, 2010, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit issued an important decision in Eyeblaster, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 1:54 am
NAB’s registration statement in the United States, for example, pertained to “ordinary shares” (At page 58 of the Supplemental Joint Appendix in Morrison v. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 1:25 am
(IP Whiteboard) A blueprint to nurture the creatives: it takes Brains… (IPKat) Pigs and protection: Old Spots get the TSG treatment (Class 46) United States US General Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit: Injunction in Bimbo Bakeries case maintained; secret muffin formula still safe? [read post]
1 Aug 2010, 11:13 pm
A brand new trademark case, recently filed in the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota, caused my trip down windmill memory lane. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 8:53 am
or Groves v. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 9:08 am
– Trading Markets.com, July 21, 2010 Consistent with Section 122 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, as amended (“CERCLA”), 42 U.S.C. 9622(d), and 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby given that on July 16, 2010, the United States lodged a Consent Decree with 163 defendants (each of which is identified in the proposed Decree) in United States of America v. [read post]
