Search for: "Wal-Mart Inc. Stores" Results 1461 - 1480 of 1,969
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Apr 2007, 11:30 am
Employers could face sizeable punitive damage awards on top of the wages due for break violations, since the primary argument relied upon (i.e., in the Wal-Mart case) was that one could not recover punitive damages for failure to pay a penalty. [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 8:31 am by Rebecca S. Bjork
Supreme Court’s employer-friendly rulings in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Oct 2007, 10:32 am
The Center for Disease Control and Prevention has linked at least 174 cases of Salmonella in 32 states to frozen pot pies produced by ConAgra Foods Inc. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 9:58 am by John Stigi
Scientific Atlanta, Inc., 552 U.S. 148 (2008), or decisions governing class action certification, including Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Aug 2020, 2:41 pm by Bill Marler
  The law firm has brought Salmonella lawsuits against such companies as Cargill, ConAgra, Peanut Corporation of America, Sheetz, Taco Bell, Subway and Wal-Mart. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 7:43 pm by Steven G. Pearl
On that basis, plaintiffs were paid a single seventh day premium at the end of the second workweek.Slip op. at 3, citing In re Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. [read post]
16 Feb 2013, 8:40 am by JakeMcGowan
Brian Masck’s Claims Against the Plethora of Defendants Brian Masck is suing Sports Illustrated, Nissan, Getty Images, Champions Press, Photo File, Inc., Fathead, Wal-Mart, Amazon.com, and Desmond Howard himself. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 5:30 am by Wes Anderson
But Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. has styled the website as something else – infringement upon its WALMART trademark. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 6:45 am by Joy Waltemath
Specifically, Greenspring asked the appeals court to follow the Eighth Circuit’s holding in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc v RLI Insurance Co. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 11:02 am by Matt C. Bailey
LEXIS 86769, at 26-28.In certifying the subclass, the Court rejected the defendant’s argument that the Supreme Court’s decision Wal-Mart precluded a finding of commonality based solely on the testimony of the discrict managers alleged de facto policy: The Court also rejects defendants' argument that the recent Supreme Court decision in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 9:04 am by Abbott & Kindermann
Superior Court (Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.) (2012) 210 Cal.App.4th 1006:Under the Elections Code, a city council facing a qualifying citizen sponsored land use initiative measure is precluded from direct adoption of the measure without first complying with CEQA. [read post]