Search for: "Wallace v. Wallace" Results 1461 - 1480 of 1,538
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jun 2007, 7:30 pm
On July 2, 1976, in deciding the case of Gregg v Georgia, the Supreme Court legalised capital punishment after a decade-long moratorium on executions. [read post]
31 May 2007, 2:21 am
Wallace concurred, stating though that a modified categorical approach should be used.US v. [read post]
30 May 2007, 11:50 pm
The major issues in the 1968 campaign were not the Civil Rights Act but Vietnam, on which Wallace had far less to say; busing, on which Nixon and Wallace largely agreed; and law and order, on which Nixon and Wallace also largely agreed. [read post]
24 May 2007, 12:49 pm
In Nos. 05-1645 & 06-11, Wallace v. [read post]
20 May 2007, 9:57 am
The US had submitted a brief, I believe, for restructuring Mississippi higher eduction according to the principle of Green v. [read post]
13 May 2007, 11:18 pm
Yesterday, on "Fox News Sunday," Chris Wallace invited Rudy Giuliani to clarify what he'd said at the Republican debate on the subject of abortion, that it would be "okay" if Roe v. [read post]
9 May 2007, 10:34 am
Here's how Judge Wallace begins his opinion in this case: "This case presents a new issue for our court: whether debtors' pre-bankruptcy application of their right to tax refunds to post-bankruptcy tax obligations constitutes an asset that must be turned over to the bankruptcy trustee pursuant to the Bankruptcy Code, 11 U.S.C. [read post]
22 Apr 2007, 12:05 pm
An underreported case is Wallace v. [read post]
21 Apr 2007, 7:49 am
Wallace, 332 F.3d 30, 32 (1st Cir. 2003) (explaining that "centrally, the mercurial phrase 'probable cause' means a reasonable likelihood" (citing Illinois v. [read post]
12 Apr 2007, 2:08 pm
" Earlier this week, Florida International Law Professor Howard Wasserman had this commentary at FindLaw on the Court's decision in Wallace v. [read post]
9 Apr 2007, 4:45 am
Wasserman has an essay entitled "The Supreme Court's Recent Decision in Wallace v. [read post]