Search for: "Adams v. New York" Results 1481 - 1500 of 2,390
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Apr 2013, 9:01 am by Rachel Sachs
  And Ilya Somin, writing at the Volokh Conspiracy, responds to Linda Greenhouse’s Opinionator column in yesterday’s issue of The New York Times, which Cormac covered in yesterday’s round-up. [read post]
9 Dec 2007, 9:12 am
Most importantly and impressively and of greatest relevance for the readers of "Adam Smith, Esq. [read post]
19 Apr 2018, 9:30 pm by Bobby Chen
Adam Liptak wrote in an op-ed for The New York Times that President Trump’s travel ban, scheduled for oral argument at the U.S. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 3:14 am by Amy Howe
  Other coverage comes from Nina Totenberg of NPR, Mark Walsh at Education Week’s The School Law Blog, Adam Liptak of The New York Times, Richard Wolf of USA Today, and Voice of America News. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 3:22 pm
Post, one of the nation’s oldest property-law cases, was reversed this week by the Supreme Court of New York. [read post]
19 Aug 2021, 9:35 am by Race to the Bottom
(Nasdaq, Rule 5605(f)).By implementing these new rules, Nasdaq has taken a step that other organizations, such as the SEC and the New York Stock Exchange, have not. [read post]
10 Dec 2009, 4:28 pm
State: Sheriff Joe Arpaio almost attends fundraiser in Elkhart County … The Agitator: Update in Maricopa County Simple Justice (New York): Maricopa: The Counter Attack Continues Emptywheel » Arpaio And Thomas: The Most Unethical Sheriff And … Goldwater State: The Maricopa County tantrum continues. [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
” [National Constitution Center podcast with Jeffrey Rosen via Ronald Collins, Concurring Opinions] Second Circuit confirms: law allowing expungement of arrest records doesn’t require media to go back and delete related news stories [AP, Volokh] Rakofsky suit against legal bloggers and other defendants (more than 80 in all) sputters toward apparent conclusion [Turkewitz, more (need for stronger protections against speech-chilling suits under New York… [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 5:03 am by zshapiro
As Adam Liptak’s New York Times column points out no rule of court requires the clerk’s office to attempt to track down an attorney when an order is returned. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 6:03 am by Walter Reaves
  Adam Liptak of the New York Times wrote about a case the Court agreed to hear earlier this year -  Perry v. [read post]
6 Aug 2020, 4:00 am by James Romoser
Additional coverages comes from Adam Liptak of the New York Times and Greg Stohr of Bloomberg. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 6:44 am by Kiran Bhat
Adam Liptak of The New York Times reports on a study by Richard Hasen of the University of California, Irvine which found a decline in the number of instances in which Congress overrides the Court’s statutory interpretation. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 3:38 am by Jonathan H. Adler
The New York Times' Adam Liptak has an interesting "Sidebar" column on a case raising the question of whether a court's decision to allow a witness to testify over Zoom violated a criminal defendant's rights under the Confrontation Clause. [read post]
27 Aug 2020, 5:41 am by James Romoser
At Subscript Law, Mariam Morshedi has a new infographic report explaining Carney v. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 8:07 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Ryan, good guest blogging on the subject at Sentencing Law & Policy, as well as Adam Liptak's coverage in the New York Times and notable commentary at the ABA Journal, the Courthouse News Service, and the Habeas Book Blog. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 4:32 pm
No luck for the Englishman in New York, as the selfie was declared unprotectable by a US court because it was shot by a non-human [see here,  here and here for previous posts on this case]. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 8:46 am by James Bickford
  Adam Liptak of the New York Times and Robert Barnes of the Washington Post expanded their coverage for the Saturday editions, while Warren Richey of the Christian Science Monitor added his. [read post]
22 May 2019, 8:14 am by Sarah Grant
The White House is considering restricting Chinese video surveillance giant Hikvision’s ability to buy American technology, says the New York Times. [read post]