Search for: "American Federation of Government Employees v. United States" Results 1481 - 1500 of 1,887
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Oct 2011, 5:41 am by Rick St. Hilaire
Second, they could be forfeited under 19 USC 1497(a)(1) because there was no declaration of entry made on any customs form when imported into the United States. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 8:56 am by Conor McEvily
Much of the news coverage of the Court focuses on yesterday’s grants: In United States v. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 1:29 pm by WIMS
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Central District of California. [read post]
24 Sep 2011, 3:58 am
The Bakanovases did not leave the United States, and in January 2007 they were arrested on immigration charges and released on bond. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 8:21 am by Terry Moritz
  During the 2010 Term, the United States Supreme Court decided another significant Federal Arbitration Act (“FAA”) case, AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 3:30 pm by Eugene Volokh
After all, it was no less a liberal icon than Franklin Roosevelt who authorized the internment of 120,000 Japanese-American citizens during World War II. [read post]
18 Sep 2011, 11:26 am by Jasmine Joseph
Quon, the United States Supreme Court considered both of these questions. [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 1:39 pm
Conspiracy to Rig Bids, Fix Prices, Allocate MarketsAccording to a two-count criminal information filed on September 15 in the federal district court in Houston, the Japan-based Bridgestone conspired to rig bids, fix prices, and allocate market shares of marine hose in the United States and elsewhere in violation of Sec. 1 of the Sherman Act and, separately, conspired to make corrupt payments to government officials in various Latin American countries to… [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 4:12 am by Maxwell Kennerly
Because the obstetrician and pediatrician worked at a federally-funded clinic, they were immune under the Federal Tort Claims Act, and the United States government was substituted as a defendant. [read post]
4 Sep 2011, 7:15 am
The clinic and its doctors are deemed federal employees under the Federally Supported Health Centers Assistance Act, 42 U.S.C. 233(g)-(n), and shielded from liability under the Federal Tort Claims Act. [read post]
4 Sep 2011, 7:15 am
The clinic and its doctors are deemed federal employees under the Federally Supported Health Centers Assistance Act, 42 U.S.C. 233(g)-(n), and shielded from liability under the Federal Tort Claims Act. [read post]
3 Sep 2011, 4:00 pm
" This provision, the Double Jeopardy Clause, is intended to prevent the state and Federal governments from prosecuting someone for the same offense more than once. [read post]