Search for: "BELLE v. STATE" Results 1481 - 1500 of 2,989
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Dec 2009, 4:17 am
The old adage that "the bell rung cannot be unrung" comes to mind. [read post]
13 Jul 2007, 4:07 pm
For the reasons stated below, we AFFIRM. 07a0261p.06 2007/07/11 Parks v. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 12:23 pm
*****PREVIOUSLY, ON NEVER TOO LATE Never too late 35 [week ending Sunday 1 March] – EPO v SUEPO | Supreme Petfoods Ltd v Henry Bell & Co (Grantham) Ltd | UK IPO on EPO | Scents and copyright | GIs under scrutiny | UPC test-drive | Is UK failing to protect innovation? [read post]
26 Apr 2015, 4:36 pm by INFORRM
Next week in the courts On 28 April 2015, there will be an application in the case of Bell v. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 3:32 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“In reviewing a motion pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(7) to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a cause of action, the facts as alleged in the complaint must be accepted as true, the plaintiff is accorded every possible favorable inference, and the court’s function is to determine only whether the facts as alleged fit within any cognizable legal theory” (Mendelovitz v Cohen, 37 AD3d 670, 671; see Belling v City of Long Beach, 168 AD3d 900).… [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 1:21 pm by Sheppard Mullin
The plaintiffs aggregation theory is reminiscent of the 1949 decision of the United States Supreme Court in Standard Oil Co. of California v. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 12:28 pm by Priscilla Smith
Carhart, and its decision earlier this summer in United States v. [read post]
28 Jul 2008, 2:35 pm
Summum (07-665) — right to display religious monument on government property, including public park Bell v. [read post]
10 Oct 2024, 6:31 pm
Introduction   Fear has returned to the constitutional state.[1]  Or rather, a state of dread for the constitutional state, one “forced to it,- forced by dread causes. [read post]