Search for: "Battle v. State" Results 1481 - 1500 of 8,255
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Aug 2020, 6:54 am by Eric Goldman
The advertisement states, “Compare Our Dumpster Smasher–No Franchise Fees, Higher ROI. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 5:01 am by Sean Quirk
” Since the July 12, 2016, arbitral tribunal ruling in Philippines v. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
 As previously reported, last week church and its pastor filed suit in a California state trial court challenging on state constitutional grounds California's COVID-19 restrictions on worship services. [read post]
15 Aug 2020, 5:23 am by Florian Mueller
In the 2010s, the most important legal battles surrounding smartphones and tablet computers were centered around patent infringement assertions (even Oracle v. [read post]
13 Aug 2020, 6:59 am by Kristian Soltes
Department of Justice and a contingent of state attorneys general challenged AmEx’s anti-steering rules in a case that reached the Supreme Court in 2018 as Ohio v. [read post]
11 Aug 2020, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
” And, at a similarly crucial point in Matal v. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 6:33 pm by Bob Ambrogi
“To state a copyright claim, Plaintiffs need allege only ‘(1) ownership of a valid copyright, and (2) copying of constituent elements of the work that are original,'” the brief says, citing the seminal copyright case, Feist Publ’ns, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 11:34 am by Steve Gottlieb
— This commentary was scheduled for broadcast on WAMC Northeast Report on August 11, 2020. [1] https://www.npr.org/2020/06/27/884213464/dc-statue-of-lincoln-standing-over-a-formerly-enslaved-man-sparks-controversy [2] United States v Cruikshank, 92 U.S. 542 (1875). [3] I don’t know if Goldman ever wrote up his lecture but here’s a link to someone else’s reconstruction,… [read post]
9 Aug 2020, 5:15 am by Matt Gluck, Tia Sewell
Nathaniel Sobel and Julia Solomon-Strauss discussed the most recent developments in the Trump v. [read post]
4 Aug 2020, 5:16 am by James Romoser
In an essay for the Regulatory Review’s ongoing Supreme Court series, Rachel Rebouché explains what Roberts’ concurring opinion in June Medical Services v. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 4:00 am by James Romoser
In another essay for the series, Amelia Burnette explores United States Forest Service v. [read post]
2 Aug 2020, 5:56 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
In my submissions on Bill 184 to the Standing Committee on Social Policy I stated, 64. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 4:00 am by Canadian Forum on Civil Justice
Because we recognize that this is a fair way of proceeding in the context of a serious power-imbalance between the state’s ability to prosecute and the accused’s ability to defend themselves against the power and resources of the state. [read post]