Search for: "Block v. People" Results 1481 - 1500 of 4,379
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jan 2025, 4:00 am by Ian Mackenzie
In addition to addressing interests, it is almost as important to consider people’s “blocks” by asking ourselves the following questions: What keeps them from adopting this terminology? [read post]
29 Aug 2022, 1:23 pm by Amy Howe
During one protest, more than 180 people were arrested for blocking traffic. [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 1:46 pm by nflatow
Her ruling also blocked provisions that allowed police officers to hold anyone arrested for any crime until their immigration status was determined. [read post]
2 Aug 2018, 11:54 am by Eugene Volokh
Claiborne Hardware Co. (1982))—your suit would be blocked by the First Amendment. [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 5:31 am by Anoush Baghdassarian
” Nevertheless, the road remains blocked, and the people living there are denied freedom of movement. [read post]
4 Mar 2012, 9:15 am by NL
Mrs N took the lease of Apartment 18, on the first floor of a newly converted block in 2005. [read post]
4 Mar 2012, 9:15 am by NL
Mrs N took the lease of Apartment 18, on the first floor of a newly converted block in 2005. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 8:11 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Officers should be advised not to threaten, intimidate, or otherwise discourage an individual from recording police officer enforcement activities or intentionally block or obstruct cameras or recording devices. [read post]
13 Jan 2022, 1:16 pm
(Supreme Court blocks COVID-19 vaccine-or-testing mandate for workplaces but lets medical rule stand) The opinion--delivered per curiam--the concurrence, and the dissent are straightforward. [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 9:01 am by Eugene Volokh
"The mere fact that judicial records may reveal potentially embarrassing information is not in itself sufficient reason to block public access. [read post]
29 Apr 2009, 7:53 am
Both Jeralyn and I wrote about the Ninth Circuit decision (PDF) in Mohamed v. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm by Marty Lederman
As I explained in one of my earlier posts, several or all of the Justices might be inclined to decide the case on some ground that doesn’t require the Court to decide whether Donald Trump is eligible to be President, if such an “off-ramp” solution is legally available. [read post]