Search for: "Bounds v. State" Results 1481 - 1500 of 10,125
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Dec 2009, 6:48 pm
The banking lobbies sure look stronger than ever… essentially more than capable of leaping tall buildings in a single bound. [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 6:09 am
Supp. 3d 196 (S.D.N.Y. 2015) – to the extent that’s even possible under United States v. [read post]
15 Apr 2015, 5:51 am by Stefan Passantino
  Sooner or later, an intelligent, articulate legal scholar was bound to apply legitimate intellectual rigor and research to this blog’s musings. [read post]
11 Jul 2008, 10:57 am
Earlier this week, the Court of Appeals issued a decision in the case, ultimately ruling that the defendant was not entitled to a new trial.The facts in State v. [read post]
3 Dec 2023, 10:00 pm
It is only after that process is completed that equitable relief may be pursued.Since W.K. first needed to exhaust all “administrative remedies” with the PHHPC, (as outlined in the state’s Public Health Law), before seeking an injunction, the AD2 thought the order compelling his admittance was issued prematurely and was thus rescinded.This couldn't be what the doctor ordered ….# # #DECISIONW.K. v New York Presbyt. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 6:17 pm by Kenneth J. Vanko
A fair number of states, including Washington, South Carolina, and Minnesota, hold that an at-will employee is not bound by an afterthought covenant unless some consideration is provided to him or her. [read post]
25 Jul 2017, 6:00 am by Colby Pastre
Under the Articles of Confederation, states with ports taxed commerce bound for interior states, tariff wars proliferated, and the national economy was imperiled. [read post]
28 May 2010, 2:25 am
In Justin Mayhew v (1) Philip King (2) Milbank Trucks Ltd (Defendants) & Chaucer Insurance plc (Third Party and Part 20 Claimant) v Towergate Stafford Knight Company Limited & Ors Sir Edward Evans-Lombe held that a term of a settlement agreement which stated that a right to an indemnity would cease if the party with the benefit of the indemnity went into administration was contrary to the anti-deprivation principle and would be struck out.The claimant, Justin… [read post]