Search for: "Chase v. Chase" Results 1481 - 1500 of 3,277
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Feb 2019, 4:18 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
An action to recover damages for legal malpractice must be commenced within three years of accrual, “regardless of whether the underlying theory is based in contract or tort” (CPLR 214[6]; see McCoy v Feinman, 99 NY2d 295, 301; Chase Scientific Research v NIA Group, 96 NY2d 20; Quinn v McCabe, Collins, McGeough & Fowler, LLP, 138 AD3d at 1086; Alizio v Ruskin Moscou Faltischek, P.C., 126 AD3d at 735; Farage… [read post]
10 Feb 2020, 4:36 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
An action to recover damages for legal malpractice must be commenced within three years of accrual, “regardless of whether the underlying theory is based in contract or tort” (CPLR 214 [6]; see McCoy v Feinman, 99 NY2d 295, 301 [2002]; Chase Scientific Research v NIA Group, 96 NY2d 20 [2001]; Quinn v McCabe, Collins, McGeough & Fowler, LLP, 138 AD3d at 1086; Alizio v Ruskin Moscou Faltischek, P.C., 126 AD3d at… [read post]
16 May 2011, 1:13 pm by Blog Editorial
Judgments outstanding The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: R (SK) (Zimbabwe) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 10-11 Feb 2010 JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. and another v Berliner Verkehrsbetriebe (BVG) Anstalt des Oeffentlichen Rechts, heard 11 November 2010 Al Rawi and others (Respondents) v The Security Service and others (Appellants), heard 24 -27 January 2011 Home Office (Appellant) v Tariq (Respondent), heard 24… [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 3:45 am by Russ Bensing
Ice impacts State v. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 4:03 am
Oregon on State v. [read post]
23 Apr 2008, 5:02 pm
In Andrews v Chevy Chase Bank (click here for the amended complaint), a Wisconsin couple claimed their home loan violated federal lending laws and warranted a “rescission,” or cancellation. [read post]
15 Jun 2016, 11:47 am by CJLF Staff
  Matt Bittle of the Delaware State News reports that in Rauf v. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 11:36 am by CJLF Staff
  Katie McHugh of Breitbart reports that the issue has been worsened by the 2001 Supreme Court ruling Zadvydas v. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 9:12 am by Mark Tushnet
(The cynic in me thinks that the explanation of the labels is bureaucracy: The editors in the Essays department didn't have enough "real" Essays to work on -- or those in the Articles department had too many Articles -- so the managing editor assigned the submissions to even out the work.)(2) The Essay has a discussion of Justice Samuel Chase's opinion in Calder v. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 4:52 pm by INFORRM
He struck out the plaintiff’s chase level 1 meaning (the words were understood to mean she was a thief) but refused to strike out the pleaded chase level 2 meaning (there were grounds to suspect the plaintiff was a thief). [read post]