Search for: "Christian v. United States"
Results 1481 - 1500
of 1,921
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Mar 2011, 1:34 pm
(2) Does Section 514 of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act violate the First Amendment of the United States Constitution? [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 6:37 am
United States and Board of Trustees of Leland Stanford Junior University v. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 5:27 pm
The gist of Common Cause's wide-ranging complaint is that the two justices "attended . . . retreats sponsored by Koch Industries, the second-largest privately held corporation in the United States and a major political player that directly benefited from the Citizens United decision. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 1:26 pm
CaldwellDocket: 10-622Issue(s): (1) Whether a binding agreement among multiple states and private companies is immunized from antitrust scrutiny under the state-action immunity doctrine of Parker v. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 6:27 am
United States and United States v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 10:59 pm
In that respect, as was explained in a previous post, the in the recent case of Schalk and Kopf v Austria, the European Court of Human Rights decided that at this point in time, Article 12 does not require States to allow same-sex marriage. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 6:41 am
United States and United States v. [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 11:00 am
In Lilly v. [read post]
13 Feb 2011, 7:08 pm
In Katzenbach v. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 2:56 pm
An election law based on the principle of proportional representation so that Egypt can truly become a state of institutions and multiple parties. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 6:43 am
In August 2007, after viewing the images, NCMEC referred the matter to the Maine State Police Computer Crimes Unit (MSPCCU), directing MSPCCU to images associated with the `lilhottyohh’ screen name as well as those associated with a second screen name, `lilhottee00000. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 4:35 pm
Tomack, was filed in the United States District Court for the Central District of California. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 6:06 pm
Billing Fraud: VIRGINIA FEDERAL JUDGE WON'T DISMISS MEDICARE FRAUD DEFENDANTS, United States v. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 2:43 pm
" The Court of Appeals found that Detective Schrott's statement undermined the Miranda warning, the well-known statement of a criminal defendant's rights deriving from the United States Supreme Court case, Miranda v. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 9:25 am
” Michael Doyle at the Sacramento Bee briefly summarizes the facts of the case in Harrington v. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 5:00 am
Today we look at a sister case, Harrington v. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 6:34 am
United States, predicting that the Court’s “ruling is likely to be quite narrow. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 6:34 am
United States, predicting that the Court’s “ruling is likely to be quite narrow. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 3:01 pm
(United States v. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 6:18 am
United States (consolidated with General Dynamics Corp. v. [read post]
