Search for: "Court v. Administrative Office"
Results 1481 - 1500
of 14,561
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Apr 2019, 5:00 am
Where there is room for choice, the court may not substitute its judgment for that of the hearing officer regarding the credibility of the witness. [read post]
7 May 2023, 9:30 pm
In the Matter of Law Offices of Cory H. [read post]
7 May 2023, 9:30 pm
In the Matter of Law Offices of Cory H. [read post]
22 Oct 2012, 5:27 am
Court rules that it lacks jurisdiction to consider a motion to vacate an arbitrator’s action absent a “final award” Jordan-Elbridge Central School District v Anonymous, RJI #33-12-2305, Index #2012-35852, Supreme Court Onondaga County, Justice Donald A. [read post]
28 Nov 2018, 4:00 am
Supreme Court transferred the matter to the Appellate Division, which affirmed the Sheriff's decision.Citing Matter of Kuznia v Adams, 106 AD3d 1227, the court explained that "The standard of review to be applied in reviewing an administrative determination made pursuant to Civil Service Law §75 is whether the determination is supported by substantial evidence in the record as a whole. [read post]
28 Nov 2018, 4:00 am
Supreme Court transferred the matter to the Appellate Division, which affirmed the Sheriff's decision.Citing Matter of Kuznia v Adams, 106 AD3d 1227, the court explained that "The standard of review to be applied in reviewing an administrative determination made pursuant to Civil Service Law §75 is whether the determination is supported by substantial evidence in the record as a whole. [read post]
29 Jan 2011, 4:02 pm
It takes a lot for the Divisional Court to intervene and they will generally default to deference to the administrative body with the expertise and experience for adjudicating specific complaints under a particular statute. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 5:01 am
See Business Roundtable v. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 4:00 am
By order dated June 28, 2017, the Supreme Court, Westchester County, transferred the proceeding to this Court pursuant to CPLR 7804(g).In this proceeding, the petitioner seeks to annul the determination of the Justice Center, contending that it was not supported by substantial evidence (see CPLR 7804[g]). [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 2:16 pm
Hyatt v. [read post]
12 Feb 2016, 7:52 am
The Mayor’s Office for Policing and Crime v Mitsui Sumitomo Insurance Co (Europe) Ltd & Ors, heard 21 January 2016. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 11:21 am
" [ Download Microsoft v. i4i Supreme Court Decision] Thomas G. [read post]
8 Apr 2012, 10:49 am
An officer had been placed on administrative leave, and the newspaper discovered that the officer had allegedly viewed child pornography. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 6:07 am
With the Kappos v. [read post]
30 May 2022, 1:46 pm
Hyatt v. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 12:57 pm
NLRB v. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 1:54 pm
Supreme Court ruled in OIL STATES ENERGY SERVICES, LLC v. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 7:26 pm
Presently on the emergency docket, Department of Homeland Security et al. v. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 1:02 pm
If the first argument of the week (Return Mail Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jul 2007, 4:56 pm
Nevertheless, rulemaking without prior comment has increased across a wide range of agencies, a trend that may be strong enough to persist despite the Supreme Court's 2001 decision in United States v. [read post]
