Search for: "DUKE v. STATE"
Results 1481 - 1500
of 2,007
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jan 2019, 8:27 am
Dukes and the 2013 decision in Comcast Corp. v. [read post]
4 Jul 2022, 2:56 pm
The High Court has ruled that security and intelligence services must obtain “prior independent authorisation” to access individuals’ communication data from telecommunications companies (Liberty v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2022] EWHC 1630 (Admin)). [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 1:41 pm
A few days after the Supreme Court decided New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 11:45 am
v. [read post]
10 Oct 2012, 8:44 pm
Last Monday, the United States Supreme Court denied a writ of certiorari to review the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals’ ruling in McReynolds v. [read post]
15 Feb 2019, 7:02 am
Duke Power Co., 401 U.S. 424 (1971). [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 7:26 am
Dukes , 131 S. [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court’s Shelby County v. [read post]
14 Sep 2007, 9:31 am
But now you know which school is Suburban State University, and that my home state is California--not just Sunny Desert State. [read post]
2 Sep 2015, 4:09 pm
Christie , Duke University School of Law The U.S. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 12:00 am
., v. [read post]
10 Jul 2015, 2:14 am
Having duked the matter out in the United States Patents and Trademarks Office, and subsequently at the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, the matter has moved on to the District Court of Virginia, where the decision was handed down only a few days ago.Pro-Football Inc v Amanda Blackhorse et al. [read post]
23 May 2012, 4:00 pm
Next up is yet another state-on-top habeas case, Howes v. [read post]
13 Jun 2021, 4:54 pm
Media groups have complained that this is a step to state control. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 5:58 am
But unless you can get a class action certified — tricky, but possible, like in Dukes v. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 5:09 pm
Inc. v. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 8:47 am
Dukes, 131 S. [read post]
13 May 2016, 8:30 am
EEOC v. [read post]
1 Jan 2007, 11:15 pm
The case is US v. [read post]
