Search for: "Daily v. Daily"
Results 1481 - 1500
of 17,078
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jan 2011, 3:12 am
” WLR Daily, 27th January 2011 Source: www.lawreports.co.uk Please note once a case has been fully reported in one of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR Daily summary is removed. [read post]
7 Nov 2018, 6:39 am
The case of Gindel v. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 3:55 am
” WLR Daily, 10th March 2011 Source: www.iclr.co.uk Please note once a case has been fully reported in one of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR Daily summary is removed. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 2:24 am
” WLR Daily, 31st March 2011 Source: www.iclr.co.uk Please note that once a case has been fully reported in one of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR Daily summary is removed. [read post]
20 Jan 2009, 1:53 am
R v Khan and others [2009] EWCA Crim 2; [2009] WLR (D) 8 “Where a member of the same household as a child or vulnerable adult was charged with allowing his or her death, the question whether the defendant had had frequent contact with him or her was a free-standing question, unrelated to issues whether that [...] [read post]
17 Mar 2009, 2:56 am
Sinclair v Glatt and others [2009] EWCA Civ 176; [2009] WLR (D) 97 “A receiver appointed pursuant to s 77 of the Criminal Justice Act 1988 to get in the assets of a convicted money launderer was entitled to recover his remuneration, costs and expenses from the realisable assets caught by the order. [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 2:21 am
R (A) v Secretary of State for Health [2009] EWCA Civ 225; [2009] WLR (D) 113 “A failed asylum seeker was not ‘ordinarily resident’ within the United Kingdom for the purposes of entitlement to treatment as of right by the National Health Service free of charge. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 3:49 am
Youell v La Reunion Aerienne [2009] EWCA Civ 175; [2009] WLR (D) 95 “Where a court could otherwise determine the substance of a claim, the mere fact that the claim was the subject of an arbitration agreement did not deprive the court of its jurisdiction under Council Regulation (EC) 44/2001 on jurisdiction and the recognition and [...] [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 1:42 am
Protectacoat Firthglow Ltd v Szilagyi [2009] EWCA Civ 98; [2009] WLR (D) 67 “In determining whether a person who had carried out work for a company was its employee within the meaning of s 230 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, if the document purporting to retain the services of a person did not represent the [...] [read post]
7 Jul 2009, 2:35 am
Masood and others v Zahoor and others [2009] EWCA 650; [2009] WLR (D) 231 “Where a claimant relied on a forged document he forfeited the right to have an adjudication of his claim, and it was irrelevant that the defendant also relied on forged documents. [read post]
2 Mar 2009, 3:00 am
Office of Communications v Information Comr; [2009] WLR (D) 71 “When balancing the public interest in maintaining an exception to disclosure of environmental information against the public interest in its disclosure the correct test was to consider whether the aggregate public interest in maintaining the exception outweighed the public interest in disclosure. [read post]
4 Nov 2020, 11:22 pm
In the October 23, 2020 issue of the Los Angeles Daily Journal, the Daily Journal published an article written by the McKennon Law Group PC’s Robert J. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 4:44 am
"get ready for the viacom v. youtube summary judgment briefs" http://j.mp/cnhSxmRT @Miss_Chicken: Oh #btub. [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 4:05 pm
The Daily News Reports: A... [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 5:10 am
ebookers.com Deutschland GmbH v Bundesverband der Verbraucherzentralen und Verbraucherverbände – Verbraucherzentrale Bundesverband eV: (Case C-112/11); [2012] WLR (D) 217 “The concept of ’optional price supplements’, referred to in the last sentence of article 23(1) of Parliament and Council Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of 24 September 2008 on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community, covered costs… [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 5:05 am
Where a claimant took out ATE insurance after having succeeded at trial he would be entitled if successful in the appeal to recover in costs that part of the ATE premium relating to the costs of the appeal, but it would be unfair to allow him to recover in costs that part of the premium which related to the costs of the trial.” WLR Daily, 19th July 2012 Source: www.iclr.co.uk [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 3:04 am
” WLR Daily, 22nd August 2012 Source: www.iclr.co.uk [read post]
9 Jun 2009, 1:49 am
AB and others v Ministry of Defence [2009] EWHC 1225 (QB); [2009] WLR (D) 174 “In relation to a group action the issue as to when a claimant had "knowledge" for the purposes of ss 12 and 14 of the Limitation Act 1980 was primarily one of fact The state of the claimant's belief was to [...] [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 10:24 am
Sixty cases like Bonafide v. [read post]
21 Sep 2022, 10:27 am
Supreme Court last year in a landmark constitutional law case upholding the First Amendment in Thomas More Center v. [read post]
