Search for: "Discovery Benefits, Inc."
Results 1481 - 1500
of 1,959
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Sep 2013, 7:05 pm
Liggett Group, Inc. [read post]
29 Aug 2022, 4:40 am
., Inc. [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 4:37 pm
Knopf, Inc. (7th Cir. 1993) ("If it is plain that the speaker is expressing a subjective view, an interpretation, a theory, conjecture, or surmise, rather than claiming to be in possession of objectively verifiable facts, the statement is not actionable); Phantom Touring, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Dec 2015, 5:30 am
GameStop, Inc., — F. [read post]
15 Aug 2020, 11:36 am
Some apply the summary-judgment or trial-like standard to conspiracy allegations, particularly when confronted with “non-parallel-conduct” cases, despite the fact that a complaint at that stage is constructed without the benefits of discovery. [read post]
3 May 2021, 9:05 pm
These intermediary platforms may impede price discovery and price accuracy, harming retail traders. [read post]
27 Dec 2023, 9:40 am
* Serc-CA Discos, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 12:53 pm
KBR, Inc. [read post]
17 Apr 2009, 5:00 am
(IAM) US Federal Trade Commission considers issues in patent damages awards (IP Law Blog) Lockheed case reveals legislative gap in patent law (Law 360) Pepsi strikes back at Coke over sports drink ads (Law 360) Automotive Technologies International Inc. drops one of its four patent infringement claims against GM, Ford and others (Law 360) Judge halts jury trial to hand ADT Security Services Inc. win in an infringement suit brought by Paradox Security Systems Ltd over telephone… [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 1:26 pm
Rosel Well Perforators, Inc., 734 P.2d 1177, 1180 (Kan. 1987) (“[A]bsent some special relationship or circumstance there is no duty to preserve evidence for the benefit of another. [read post]
19 Feb 2008, 3:30 am
(“Champion”) which was organized as a subsidiary of Champion Leasing Group, Inc. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 10:09 am
Fortunately, the EEOC regulations also state that this manager still could benefit from the “inadvertent acquisition” exception described above. [read post]
24 Sep 2011, 3:58 am
The bankruptcy court held that the discovery documents at issue could be disclosed to the public, because the public's interest in disclosure of these discovery documents outweighed the priests' privacy interest under Rule 26(c) and that the documents filed in court could be disclosed because they did not contain "scandalous" allegations for purposes of 11 U.S.C. 107(b). [read post]
15 Oct 2018, 7:05 am
This week the Court released the calendar for arguments at the end of November and into December these cases are: Apple, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 12:45 pm
The added requirement to also disclose the “best mode” is both unnecessary and provides no benefits to the public. [read post]
26 Jul 2006, 12:25 pm
Conway Express, Inc., 261 Ga. 41 (1991); Georgia Power Co. v. [read post]
2 Sep 2020, 6:28 pm
Fintiv, Inc., No. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 11:29 am
., Inc., 2023 WL 2574319, No. 2:22-cv-00313-JNP-DAO (D. [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 5:46 am
” Authors want to publish in reputable journals to increase their prestige, and readers searching for high-quality research are essential to the journal’s reputation, creating a two-sided market in which “‘authors benefit from greater impact and citations and thus prefer a journal that has more readers, [and] readers benefit from content and thus prefer journals with more articles. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 9:26 am
Id. at *5 (citing Medtronic, Inc. v. [read post]
