Search for: "Doe v. Baker"
Results 1481 - 1500
of 1,837
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Oct 2020, 6:30 am
At that point, the culture war over same-sex marriage had begun in earnest: Goodridge v. [read post]
29 Apr 2009, 1:59 pm
At the end of 1999, the Vermont Supreme Court ruled in Baker v. [read post]
25 Mar 2012, 2:19 pm
Ostendorf -- Absence of transcript of hearing where Kozel factors may have been considered does not require affirmance where order was devoid of any consideration of the Kozel factorsLUIS ALSINA and RITA ALSINA, Appellants, v. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 7:38 pm
This would appear to be a strange result (and goes against eg Case T-152/07 Lange Uren v OHIM). [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 1:20 am
In the following guest post, Doug Greene, Jessie Gabriel, Marco Molina, and Brian Song of the Baker & Hostetler law firm take a comprehensive look at the decision, including its context and significance. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 6:43 am
Irish constitutional law does indeed subscribe to a hierarchy of rights in some cases (see, eg, People (DPP) v Shaw [1982] IR 1, 63 (Kenny J)); but that is usually unprincipled and largely unworkable (see, eg, Attorney General v X [1992] 1 IR 1, [1992] IESC 1 (5 March 1992) [138]-[139] (McCarthy J), [184] (Egan J); Sunday Newspapers Ltd v Gilchrist and Rogers [2017] IESC 18 (23 March 2017) [36]… [read post]
31 Mar 2019, 11:50 pm
Data Protection and Data Privacy NS Tech reports that an Austrian Court has allowed Max Schrems to continue his civil claim against Facebook, rather than being required to take it to the data protection regulator, A German Labour Court has ruled that the protection of whistleblower confidentiality does not generally override the data subject access right under Article 15 of the GDPR. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 9:35 am
What does this have to do with Chapter 11 bankruptcy? [read post]
5 Nov 2024, 2:43 pm
., v. [read post]
17 Oct 2009, 10:26 am
On the issue of the political question doctrine, the Fifth Circuit applied the standard test articulated in Baker v. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 12:56 am
As Joshua Rozenberg explains, Under these arrangements, the government does not disclose sensitive evidence to the other party or its legal team. [read post]
25 Jul 2022, 1:54 am
Canada Last week the Supreme Court delivered a strong affirmation on the importance of copyright balance and the role of technological neutrality, confirming that “[c]opyright law does not exist solely for the benefit of authors,” SOCAN v Entertainment Software Association. [read post]
16 Mar 2016, 9:01 pm
Bakers who don’t want to decorate cakes for gay weddings. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 8:49 pm
Edwin Baker, and Cass Sunstein, among many others, war with modern liberty. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 8:36 pm
In the first case (Berry v. [read post]
6 Apr 2017, 6:48 am
” Hively v. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 2:25 pm
” In Williams v. [read post]
31 Aug 2009, 3:55 am
Corp. v. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 1:15 pm
See Pineck v. [read post]
25 May 2012, 8:45 am
Happel v. [read post]
