Search for: "Doe v. Baker" Results 1481 - 1500 of 1,709
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Feb 2015, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
But why does it persist in the modern period, when medicine is science-based? [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
History does make a contribution in that, for centuries, anyone with access to a printing press was a potential subversive, and legislation was drafted accordingly. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 7:10 am by INFORRM
According to Sedley LJ (with whom Sir Scott Baker agreed), the rule had “passed beyond redemption by the courts” [27] and was “anomalous, frequently otiose and, where not otiose, unjust” [31]. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 7:52 am by John Elwood
”  I’m sorry, but I thought that the answer to any question involving ACCA was “unconstitutionally vague,” including “what does ACCA taste like? [read post]
8 Jul 2016, 7:23 am by Ronald Collins
In what fundamental respect does your book – and especially the research that supports it – differ from those books? [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 4:48 am
While last week's rejection of the Google Settlement by Judge Denny Chin received plenty of airing (see IPKat here, 1709 Blog here), the Chet Baker Class Action in Canada is worth taking a look it. [read post]