Search for: "Doe v. Holder"
Results 1481 - 1500
of 6,694
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jan 2017, 4:51 am
This was - in a nutshell - the issue on which the Polish Supreme Court had sought guidance from the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in OTK v SFP, C-367/15.This morning, contrary to the earlier Opinion of Advocate General Sharpston, the CJEU answered in the negative, holding that [para 28] "the fact that Directive 2004/48 does not entail an obligation on the Member States to provide for ‘punitive’ damages cannot be… [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 1:24 pm
” Mager v. [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 1:24 pm
” Mager v. [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 1:59 am
I've seen them as an intervenor in the Nokia v. [read post]
13 Sep 2021, 3:00 am
In Holder v. [read post]
31 Mar 2023, 7:13 am
Therefore, it is key to give leverage reasonably early to SEP holders. [read post]
22 Jul 2009, 7:43 am
Not only does the UPC protect the product from tampering and help to track counterfeits, but the use of a UPC may give trademark holders greater ability to protect their trademark from diversion and counterfeiting. [read post]
31 Aug 2009, 12:14 pm
Not only does the UPC protect the product from tampering and help to track counterfeits, but the use of a UPC may give trademark holders greater ability to protect their trademark from diversion and counterfeiting. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 2:48 am
How does one actually occupy a metal staircase? [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 2:48 am
How does one actually occupy a metal staircase? [read post]
15 Sep 2015, 5:13 am
(See Black Acres Pure Trust v. [read post]
13 Feb 2015, 1:47 am
In Helferich Patent Licensing v. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 6:51 am
In EEOC v. [read post]
22 Jun 2006, 12:55 pm
Today the Supreme Court decided NOT to hear the LabCorp v. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 6:04 am
Arevalo v. [read post]
22 Jun 2006, 12:55 pm
Today the Supreme Court decided NOT to hear the LabCorp v. [read post]
12 May 2009, 4:21 pm
San Antonio Fire & Police Pension Fund v. [read post]
7 Aug 2023, 5:19 am
Even though social media account holders have not been held liable of illegal comments before, this does not violate requirements of accessibility and foreseeability in law. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 3:50 am
He noticed a cell phone in the center console cup-holder; since he thought it might belong to “one of the Defendants,” he gave it to Espinoza. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 9:01 pm
During the oral argument in Shelby County v. [read post]
