Search for: "Does v. United States of America" Results 1481 - 1500 of 4,684
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 May 2015, 5:57 am
In any event, what he said in his supposed disclaimer was that his prior post was a `complete satire’ and that he was merely engaging `in an exercise of whether free speech still exists in America. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 1:38 am
DISTRICT COURTEASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKCriminal Practice Government Wins $3.16 Million Judgment Against Cocaine Smuggler at JFK Airport United States v. [read post]
28 Jul 2019, 4:25 pm by Larry
On the other hand, I do enjoy stretching my creative lawyering skills.In Erwin Hymer Group North America, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Feb 2022, 11:25 am by Dennis Crouch
  U.S. patents only cover infringement within the  territorial bounds of the United States. [read post]
9 Aug 2022, 12:15 pm by Pete Strom
In part, this was due to the Feres Doctrine (Feres v. the United States, 340 U.S. 135), which prohibits individuals from filing a lawsuit or lawsuit based on injuries during their service. [read post]
23 Nov 2013, 7:46 am by Mark S. Humphreys
This case is out of the United States District Court, Southern District of Texas, McAllen Division. [read post]
5 May 2010, 7:13 pm by Rick
  It is worth noting that in the recent United States Supreme Court case of District of Columbia v. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 11:39 am
Cl. 2, Amendments IX, X[1]·      German Basic Law, arts.20-25; 31[2]·      Constitution of South Africa, arts. 1, 2, 39, 146-150[3]·      Indiana Code 1-1-2-1[4]·      Hierarchy of Law in Georgia[5]__________Hierarchy of Law in the United StatesConstitution of the United StatesArticle, § 1All legislative Powers herein granted shall be vested in a… [read post]
23 May 2022, 6:42 am by Eric Goldman
They could not remove speech glorifying terrorist attacks against the United States—unless they also remove speech decrying, memorializing, or educating about terrorist attacks against the United States. [read post]
18 Feb 2018, 7:45 pm by Barry Sookman
 It is, therefore, of great consequence and concern that the California court summarily decided that the order made against Google could not be enforced in the United States. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 12:13 pm by John Elwood
Certiorari stage documents: §  Opinion below (Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit) §  Petition for certiorari §  Brief in opposition §  Petitioners’ reply §  Amicus brief of the Chamber of Commerce of the United States §  Amicus brief of the Pacific Legal Foundation §  Amicus brief of DRI – The Voice of the Defense Bar §  Amicus brief of the Washington Legal Foundation Title:… [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 4:27 am by SHG
That the election of the President of the United States of America should hinge on someone like my mother’s ability to figure out how to use a ballot was a matter of some serious concern. [read post]