Search for: "Downing v. Downing"
Results 1481 - 1500
of 53,161
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Mar 2014, 2:11 am
On appeal from: [2012] EWCA Civ 66 The appellant is a man paralysed from the shoulders down who depends on his wife to manage his needs when travelling by air. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 3:53 am
The Supreme Court handed down judgment in N v ACCG & Ors [2017] UKSC 22 on 22 Mar 2017. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 9:45 am
Blake v. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 3:21 pm
Mid Atlantic Medical Services, Inc., recently handed down a decision in ACS Recovery Services, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 5:58 am
On June 12, 2024, the Court of Criminal Appeals handed down its decision in Heath v. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 5:58 am
On June 12, 2024, the Court of Criminal Appeals handed down its decision in Heath v. [read post]
24 Nov 2017, 8:37 am
In the month which has elapsed since the handing down of the Supreme Court’s judgment in Ivey v Genting Casinos UK Ltd t/a Crockfords [2017] UKSC 67, there has been no shortage of comment on the decision’s far-reaching implications for dishonesty offences in the criminal law. [read post]
23 Aug 2016, 4:00 am
CarMax Auto Superstores California LLC, 246 Cal.App.4th 973 (2016), which was handed down in April. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 6:45 am
In Mayo v, Prometheus (No. 10-1150, March 20, 2012), the Court held that U.S. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 11:33 am
Riley v Riley Husband sought review of the denial of his motion for modification of alimony. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 8:18 am
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website; JURIST news archive] on Monday ruled [opinion, PDF] 7-1 in Monsanto Company v. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 8:50 am
The US Supreme Court [official website] ruled [opinion, PDF] Monday in Matal v. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 10:18 am
The US Supreme Court [official website] ruled [opinion, PDF] 8-0 Monday in Sessions v. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 10:00 pm
The US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) recently updated its guidance for patent examiners and applicants in determining obviousness under 35 USC § 103, based on the US Supreme Court’s ruling in KSR Int’l Co. v. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 10:00 pm
The US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) recently updated its guidance for patent examiners and applicants in determining obviousness under 35 USC § 103, based on the US Supreme Court’s ruling in KSR Int’l Co. v. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 10:00 pm
The US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) recently updated its guidance for patent examiners and applicants in determining obviousness under 35 USC § 103, based on the US Supreme Court’s ruling in KSR Int’l Co. v. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 10:00 pm
In the case of Texas Medical Ass'n, et al. v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 8:09 am
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website] ruled [opinion, PDF] Monday in Judulang v. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 10:00 pm
In the case of Texas Medical Ass'n, et al. v. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 10:00 pm
The US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) recently updated its guidance for patent examiners and applicants in determining obviousness under 35 USC § 103, based on the US Supreme Court’s ruling in KSR Int’l Co. v. [read post]
