Search for: "F & M LLC" Results 1481 - 1500 of 1,627
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Aug 2009, 3:55 am
., WINDELS MARX LANE & MITTENDORF, LLP, STANLEY GALLANT, GALSTER CAPITAL LLC, GARLSTER MANAGEMENT CORP., ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, AND JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., Curiously, Footnote 3 seems to say that the entire case has been dismissed. [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 7:01 am
(ISinIP) CAFC grants en banc request to challenge written description requirement: Ariad v Lilly (Patently-O) (Filewrapper) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) (Patent Docs) (Holman's Biotech IP Blog) Supreme Court asked to yank obviousness from the purview of juries: Medela AG v Kinetic Concepts, Inc (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Patently-O) All you need to know about Bilski in a 30 min podcast - debate between Prof M Risch and Prof J Sarnoff (IP Think Tank) (Patent Baristas)… [read post]
27 Jul 2009, 7:18 am
(ipblog.ca) Federal Court upholds distinctive surname mark dispute between competing family businesses: Miranda Aluminium v Miranda Windows and Doors (Global IP Watch) China Patently speaking: Failure to heed IP in China can be costly (IP Frontline) Major breakthrough for Chinese companies in the patenting stakes (IAM) Zhengzhou Intermediate People’s Court hears arguments in Pepsi’s trade mark infringement and unfair competition case against Henan 百事… [read post]
23 Jun 2009, 2:02 am
DreamWorks, LLC et al.516 F.3d 993 (Fed. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
The Characteristics of the Most-Litigated Patents’ (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) Saving US innovation: more patent funding needed (IP Watchdog) BPAI backlog (Patently-O) Deadline to volunteer for the USPTO peer review pilot program is approaching (Patentably Defined) Check out the new beta test release of the USPTO’s website (Patentably Defined) (Just an Examiner) Second pair of eyes fails innovation in the US (IP Watchdog) USPTO needs improved workflow management (IP… [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
The Characteristics of the Most-Litigated Patents’ (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) Saving US innovation: more patent funding needed (IP Watchdog) BPAI backlog (Patently-O) Deadline to volunteer for the USPTO peer review pilot program is approaching (Patentably Defined) Check out the new beta test release of the USPTO’s website (Patentably Defined) (Just an Examiner) Second pair of eyes fails innovation in the US (IP Watchdog) USPTO needs improved workflow management (IP… [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 2:00 am
(Excess Copyright) (IPKat) (Ars Technica) (IAM) (Intellectual Property Watch) (Technology Transfer Tactics) (The IP Factor) (Patent Baristas) (ISinIP) (Managing Intellectual Property) GSK, Tafas file petitions for rehearing in Tafas v Doll (Patent Docs) (Patent Docs) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Patently-O) (Inventive Step) (IP Watchdog) Entire Federal Circuit hears argument on whether 271(f) applies to method claims: Cardiac Pacemakers v St Jude Medical (Inventive Step) District… [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 2:00 am
(Excess Copyright) (IPKat) (Ars Technica) (IAM) (Intellectual Property Watch) (Technology Transfer Tactics) (The IP Factor) (Patent Baristas) (ISinIP) (Managing Intellectual Property) GSK, Tafas file petitions for rehearing in Tafas v Doll (Patent Docs) (Patent Docs) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Patently-O) (Inventive Step) (IP Watchdog) Entire Federal Circuit hears argument on whether 271(f) applies to method claims: Cardiac Pacemakers v St Jude Medical (Inventive Step) District… [read post]
28 May 2009, 8:11 pm
Bleem, LLC, 214 F.3d 1022, 1026 (9th Cir. 2000) ("In this analysis, the commercial use of copyrighted material is not presumptively unfair; rather, commercial use is but one of four factors that we must weigh. [read post]
7 May 2009, 6:08 am
The substance was " "irritating to the mucous membrane and upper respiratory tract" and "[m]ay be harmful if inhaled," but its "acute inhalation toxicity" was "undetermined," and there was no data linking it to anosmia. [read post]
6 May 2009, 1:02 pm
   §365(b)(1).The sale will be free and clear under §363(f)(3), using the argument that "value" in that provision means economic value. [read post]