Search for: "FELLOWS v. STATE" Results 1481 - 1500 of 4,474
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Sep 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Unless a convention of the states assembled pursuant to Article V proceeds to ignore the language of Article V, the current structure of the Senate cannot be changed, and even permissible amendments will need the assent of 38 states. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 1:42 pm by David Kopel
But that's a decision to be made under the amendment process of Article V. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 5:56 am by LII Team
President and Fellows of Harvard College, Moore v. [read post]
28 Mar 2023, 2:27 pm by Eugene Volokh
(prisoner plaintiff faced retaliation in the form of serious bodily harm by fellow inmates for his cooperation with the government); Doe v. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 4:32 am by Legal Beagle
But it also states that when the action was raised, £8,000 of fees from one invoice were outstanding from one partner’s accounts. [read post]
10 Oct 2020, 8:00 am by Evan Lee
When the Supreme Court entertains argument on Tuesday in United States v. [read post]
28 Jan 2022, 9:55 am by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
El Chapo Claims of Juror Misconduct Rejected by Appellate Court InUnited States v. [read post]
27 Nov 2019, 2:52 am
In the recent IPOS decision of Harvard Club of Singapore v President and Fellows of Harvard College [2019] SGIPOS 14, the President and Fellows of Harvard College (the body corporate constituting Harvard University) (“Applicant”) filed two applications to register “HARVARD CLUB OF SINGAPORE” and “HARVARD UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE” in Class 41, both for “Club Services [education or entertainment]”. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 3:14 am by Broc Romanek
In the announcement, CalPERS states it has sent proxy access shareholder proposals to 33 energy companies as a way to push this climate change agenda. [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 10:23 am by David Oscar Markus
Heller, Justice Thomas’s once-fringe view became the law of the land.Then this past Thursday, in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. [read post]