Search for: "Flood v. State" Results 1481 - 1500 of 2,432
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jun 2012, 7:25 pm
There is an implied warranty of habitability, as stated in the Cal Supreme Court case of Green v. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 1:10 pm by WIMS
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 10:50 am by Kevin Healey
And courts may uphold such decisions due to the language in many policies excluding flood damage or even damage from “standing water,” as the courts did in Florida Residential Property & Casualty Joint Underwriting Association v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 10:39 am by Geoffrey Rapp
Shaft, Implementing the settlement of State of North Dakota v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 9:47 am by Kali Borkoski
Ball State University (Granted )Docket: 11-556Issue(s): Whether the “supervisor” liability rule established by Faragher v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 9:47 am by Kali Borkoski
Ball State University (Granted )Docket: 11-556Issue(s): Whether the “supervisor” liability rule established by Faragher v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 8:45 am by Marvin Ammori
In a widely read Atlantic piece, James Fallows just accused the five Justices--Kennedy, Scalia, Thomas, Roberts, and Alito--of being part of a judicial "coup" running back to Bush v. [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 11:53 am by National Indian Law Library
Laverdure (gaming equipment participation agreement)* State Courts Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/currentstate.htmCases featured: Hill v. [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 5:05 am by Stephanie R. Thomas, Ph.D.
 Shaun discusses the Second Circuit’s decision in Townsend v. [read post]
17 Jun 2012, 12:43 pm by Michelle Claverol
In the order, the mayor anticipated high tides, hurricane force winds, widespread severe flooding and a declaration of a state of emergency. [read post]
17 Jun 2012, 9:25 am by Angelo A. Paparelli
 Yet none but a clairvoyant could have predicted the aftermath on June 15, 1982 when the Supreme Court in Plyler v. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 3:09 pm by Bart Torvik
This flood of out-of-state money was made possible, they argue, by the Citizens United decision, which struck down certain limits on corporate electioneering. [read post]