Search for: "Fund of Funds, Limited v. First American Fund of Funds"
Results 1481 - 1500
of 2,465
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Dec 2014, 10:43 am
FEC and – less than a year ago – invalidated limits Congress placed on the overall amount that individuals may spend in a two-year federal election cycle in McCutcheon v. [read post]
21 Dec 2014, 4:17 am
United States In Ratzlaf v. [read post]
20 Dec 2014, 7:27 pm
Some of these evidenced a certain absurdity HERE (the threat to hold up funds for the new embassy, without understanding that an American embassy building is already occupied by American diplomats operating as a U.S. mission). [read post]
20 Dec 2014, 8:00 am
Reliance Funding Corp., 461 F. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 11:37 am
Article [of Amendment 10]—[Neither Foreign Law nor American Judges May Alter the Meaning of Constitution] The words and phrases of this Constitution shall be interpreted according to their meaning at the time of their enactment, which meaning shall remain the same until changed pursuant to Article V; nor shall such meaning be altered by reference to the law of nations or the laws of other nations. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 9:01 pm
Title IX and Single-Sex Education: Complicated and Changing Terrain Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 prohibits schools that receive any federal funding from discriminating on the basis of sex. [read post]
7 Dec 2014, 9:01 pm
Since the Supreme Court has observed, first in the seminal case of Pennhurst State School & Hospital v. [read post]
5 Dec 2014, 9:07 pm
Association of American Railroads. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 11:05 am
Also granted was first-time relist City and County of San Francisco v. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 4:06 am
Earlier this year, after the Delaware Supreme Court upheld the facial validity of fee-shifting bylaws in the case of ATP Tour, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 12:31 pm
In that case, American Meat Institute (AMI) v. [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 12:23 pm
The first object of enquiry is, 1st. [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 5:00 am
§ 2254(d)(2); and (2) whether a state court that denies funding to an indigent petitioner who has no other means of obtaining evidence of his mental retardation has denied petitioner his “opportunity to be heard,” contrary to Atkins and Ford v. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 12:58 pm
The Court held that it is not clearly established that a limitation on closing argument is structural error. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 5:42 am
First up are a pair of bankruptcy petitions that are “identical in substance”: Bank of America v. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 8:17 am
Tuesday afternoon I had the pleasure of debating/discussing King v. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 9:15 am
§ 2254(d)(2); and (2) whether a state court that denies funding to an indigent petitioner who has no other means of obtaining evidence of his mental retardation has denied petitioner his “opportunity to be heard,” contrary to Atkins and Ford v. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 11:36 am
” The law is aimed at limiting the release of Palestinians convicted of terror charges in goodwill gestures or prisoner swaps. [read post]
1 Nov 2014, 3:09 am
ET AL. v. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 3:08 pm
The event was sponsored by the Law School chapters of the Federalist Society and the American Constitution Society. [read post]
