Search for: "Good v. State of California" Results 1481 - 1500 of 7,483
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Nov 2014, 6:32 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Only a minority of six states allow a “best interests” consideration in the Section 1911(b) “good cause” analysis, including Arizona, California, Indiana, Montana, Oklahoma, and South Dakota.3Link to the text of the note In re Maricopa Cnty. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 8:21 am by John Elwood
California, 11-5796; Kwon v. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 4:35 am
App. 2008), got it wrong in finding generic and name-brand preemption indistinguishable, and in any event was bound by a prior California Supreme Court decision; (2) Demahy v. [read post]
16 May 2016, 9:33 am by bryannewland
Supreme Court issued its decision in Seminole Tribe v. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 12:36 pm by Eugene Volokh
. [* * *] California Restriction on Gun Ads That "Reasonably Appear[] to Be Attractive to Minors" Likely Unconstitutional From Junior Sports Magazines, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 1:25 pm
In 1982, Peralta was arrested in Bakersfield, California, under the name Gabriel Sanchez for arson, although these charges were eventually dismissed. [read post]