Search for: "Gray v. HAS"
Results 1481 - 1500
of 1,984
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Nov 2010, 4:19 am
Consider Rhone-Poulenc Rorer Inc. v. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 12:41 am
In a firm judgment delving unusually deep into the factual quagmire, the Court of Appeal has overturned the first instance decision in Force India Formula One Team Limited v (1) Etihad Airways, (2) Aldar Properties [2010] EWCA Civ 1051 (see here). [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 9:47 pm
This decision, made by Sir Charles Gray, referred to s.39(1)(a) of the Children and Young Persons Act 1933. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 4:30 pm
But the time it takes for a case to reach this stage varies substantially from 3 months (Ali v Associated Newspapers 2010 EWHC 100 (QB)) to 28 months (Kaschke v Gray 2010 EWHC 1907 (QB)) and it may well be that in many of the judgments in favour of the claimant, quantum remains in issue. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 8:26 am
Monday’s oral argument in Costco v. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 7:35 am
” In this instance, said the court, the hearing officer’s findings were supported by substantial evidence.* Addressing another issue concerning the evidence presented in the course of the disciplinary hearing, the Appellate Division commented that “Hearsay evidence may be the basis for an administrative determination,” citing Gray v Adduci, 73 NY2d 741. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 7:00 am
The massive entrance lobby was stone gray and immaculate. [read post]
7 Nov 2010, 9:55 pm
In terms of informing the public about what has happened in the case and why the order has been made these anonymised judgments provide more information to the public than that provided in JIH itself or in Gray. [read post]
7 Nov 2010, 6:55 pm
Gray, 2010 U.S. [read post]
7 Nov 2010, 4:03 pm
Third, in Court 11, what appears to be a judge alone trial in the case of Wyatt v Cartwright, is listed before Sir Charles Gray. [read post]
6 Nov 2010, 5:53 am
In terms of informing the public about what has happened in the case and why the order has been made these anonymised judgments provide more information to the public than that provided in JIH itself or in Gray. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 12:37 am
Discusses whether the super injunction has had its day, following the Queen’s Bench Division rulings in DFT v TFD [2010] EWHC 2335 (QB), AMM v HXW [2010] EWHC 2457 (QB) and Gray v UVW [2010] EWHC 2367 (QB) in which anonymity orders, rather than super injunctions, were made. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 7:15 am
In today’s case (A.B v. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 6:36 pm
Productions LLC v Aftermath Records (IP Osgoode) District Court S D New York shuts down LimeWire file-sharing service: Arista v Lime Wire (Shades of Gray) (TorrentFreak) (ArsTechnica) (Recording Industry vs. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 5:45 pm
Gray v UVW [2010] EWHC 2367 (QB). [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 5:21 pm
” Furthermore the European Court has recognised in B v United Kingdom; P v United Kingdom ([2001] 2 FLR 261) that the Article 6 requirement to hold a public hearing was subject to exceptions. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 1:32 am
In Theike v. [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 11:48 pm
Otten (EPLAW) Non-infringement case: Safeway v. [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 10:35 am
In Walmart Canada Corporation v. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 9:56 am
Bernard Gray v UVX [2010] EWHC 2367 (QB) – 21 October 2010. [read post]
