Search for: "Gregory v. State"
Results 1481 - 1500
of 1,931
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jan 2012, 11:21 am
Alden, Senior Assistant Appellate Counsel, Wyoming Public Defender Program.Representing Appellee (Plaintiff): Gregory A. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 9:56 am
Olson.Representing Appellee (Plaintiff): Gregory A. [read post]
14 Aug 2019, 6:09 am
• Douglas V. [read post]
6 Aug 2024, 6:10 am
’” Op. at 14 (quoting, in part, the test in Nixon v. [read post]
28 Mar 2014, 10:43 am
Supreme Court decided Missouri v. [read post]
20 May 2016, 6:45 am
McLaughlin and Yafit Cohn, Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP, on Friday, May 13, 2016 Tags: Acquisition agreements, Contracts, Corporate fraud, Delaware cases, Delaware law, Due diligence, Fair values,Fairness review, Liability standards, Merger litigation, Mergers & acquisitions, Reliance Genuine Parts Co. v. [read post]
26 Aug 2024, 11:43 am
From Mastriano v. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 7:35 am
A fifth indictment, United States v. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 7:35 am
A fifth indictment, United States v. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 7:35 am
A fifth indictment, United States v. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 7:35 am
A fifth indictment, United States v. [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 6:18 am
White (Vanderbilt University), on Friday, October 8, 2021 Tags: Capital allocation, Executive Compensation, Liquidity, Market conditions, Repurchases, Shareholder value SEC Form 10-K Comments Regarding Climate-Related Disclosures Posted by Brian V. [read post]
17 Oct 2007, 10:44 am
Gregory “voted to grant appellant a stay of execution until the Supreme Court decides Baze v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 7:16 am
The Sixth Circuit in Cuno v. [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 2:14 pm
Gregory, No. 07-3126 "In a 42 U.S.C. section 1983 suit alleging that state university officials had retaliated against plaintiff for exercising his First Amendment rights when he complained about the university's use of grant funds, summary judgment for defendants is affirmed where plaintiff's complaints were made in his capacity as an employee and were therefore not protected by the First Amendment. [read post]
27 May 2008, 12:21 pm
Gregory K. [read post]
19 Apr 2015, 2:13 pm
Under the estoppel doctrines of res judicata and collateral estoppel, each requires a showing that there was an identity of the parties in the present and prior litigation (Juan C. v Cortines, 89 NY2d 659 [1997]), that the claims arose out of the same transaction or series of transactions (Xiao Yang Chen v Fischer, 6 NY3d 94 [2005]), that the parties had a full and fair opportunity to contest the claims (Krista I. v Gregory I., 8 AD3d 696 Page 5 [3d Dept 2004])… [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 11:38 am
Under the estoppel doctrines of res judicata and collateral estoppel, each requires a showing that there was an identity of the parties in the present and prior litigation (Juan C. v Cortines, 89 NY2d 659 [1997]), that the claims arose out of the same transaction or series of transactions (Xiao Yang Chen v Fischer, 6 NY3d 94 [2005]), that the parties had a full and fair opportunity to contest the claims (Krista I. v Gregory I., 8 AD3d 696 Page 5 [3d Dept 2004])… [read post]
14 May 2019, 8:27 am
That's why I stated— The Court: So, it is of record, then. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 12:49 pm
Westling.Representing Appellee (Plaintiff): Gregory A. [read post]
