Search for: "HUGHES v. STATE"
Results 1481 - 1500
of 1,778
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jan 2018, 4:05 pm
The case was covered by Hugh Tomlinson QC in the following Inforrm post. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 3:20 am
The witness statement of Jemima Khan and second supplement witness statement of Hugh Grant were taken as read. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 9:01 pm
Justice Scalia famously said in his angry dissent from Lawrence v. [read post]
3 May 2024, 8:38 am
The court doesn’t acknowledge the cases saying that 512(f) preempts state law claims. [read post]
10 Sep 2011, 12:59 am
., et al. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 1:25 am
The biggest legal story of this coming week will be the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union – the Article 50 “Brexit” judgment. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 3:39 pm
" The Washington Post reports that a state sponsor of terrorism is already attempting to obtain these guns. [read post]
15 Jan 2025, 12:46 pm
Department of Education’s April 2024 Title IX Final Rule (“Final Rule”), in the case of State of Tennessee, et al. v. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 9:39 am
More recently, Dame Elish Angiolini was also appointed to the post of Principal of St Hugh’s College, Oxford. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 8:36 pm
Thompson, the Georgia Supreme Court unanimously held, in reliance on its 2009 ruling in Trinity Outdoor LLC v. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 2:30 am
. “This article is inaccurate and misrepresents the facts” the corporation stated, as reported by Tabloid Watch here. [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 11:18 am
”[xii] Effective Jan. 1 and July 15, 2020, Illinois and Kentucky, respectively, became the latest states to address smart contracts directly in legislation. [read post]
3 Sep 2018, 8:24 am
The case was heard before Lord Kerr, Lord Reed, Lord Hughes, Lady Black and Lord Lloyd-Jones on 18 Oct 2017. [read post]
1 Jul 2012, 5:52 pm
The only one of the impressive range of speeches was that given by Hugh Grant – where he called on European Union regulators to restrict the influence of media moguls such as Rupert Murdoch. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 4:02 pm
”[6] (b) Mr Hugh Tomlinson QC: the need for appropriate remedies as well as protection of bloggers If agreement of the kind described by Mr Justice Eady could be reached concerning the applicable law, why not also agreement about applicable remedies? [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 4:00 am
In the 1991 case Freytag v. [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 10:55 am
In Attorney-General v Guardian Newspapers Limited (No 2) [1990] 1 AC 109 Lord Keith stated that “the right to personal privacy is clearly one in which the law in this field should seek to protect. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 8:58 pm
Gobitis (1940) and West Virginia State Board of Education v. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 10:58 am
” Entergy Gulf States, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Jan 2017, 4:08 pm
As already mentioned, on 24, 25 and 26 January 2017, the Supreme Court (Lords Neuberger, Mance, Sumption, Hughes and Hodge) heard the joined appeals in the cases of Flood v Times Newspapers, Miller v Associated Newspapers and Frost v MGN. [read post]
