Search for: "Harmon v. Harmon"
Results 1481 - 1500
of 1,667
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 May 2023, 11:43 am
The result is a system of great complexity, hazardous in terms of its harmonization objective and whose viability (due to a risk of incompatibility with the European treaties) is not guaranteed. [read post]
13 Jul 2016, 4:00 am
The State courts and legislatures The first is the decision of the United States Supreme Court in North Carolina Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
22 Jul 2024, 1:11 pm
Del.) in Jankowicz v. [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 4:54 am
Importantly, Chapter V of the GDPR authorizes only three methods for legal data transfers from the EEA to a third country, such as the United States: adequacy decisions, appropriate safeguards or limited enumerated exceptions (“derogations”). [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 9:21 am
This preference for a single and coherent harmonized international law represents a consistent approach by the Ethics Council and contributes to the construction of a transnational governance legality that is intermeshed with but autonomous of the national systems within which portions of transnational actions are taken. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 12:00 pm
Nancy Kim, The License v. [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 9:13 am
Playing with reality v. paper rights to compromise reflecting different systems. [read post]
1 Mar 2022, 9:00 pm
Davis v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 4:36 am
Registration v. acquisition is also a big deal. [read post]
14 Jul 2013, 5:45 am
Again http://t.co/y0unOiUO3M -> Computer and Internet Law Weekly Updates for 2013-07-06: Computer and Internet Law Updates for 2013-06-28: Com… http://t.co/68wn0271oo -> Crass and Offensive Tweets by Student May not Justify Suspension — Rosario v. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 9:17 am
In the case of Qualitex Co. v. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 1:07 pm
Mazer v. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 4:22 am
Kamgar Shah v. [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 9:07 pm
This position is in line with the prevailing opinion in Japan according to which punitive damages are in principle contrary to Japanese public policy due to the fundamental difference in nature (civil v. criminal) and function (compensatory v. punitive/sanction) (For a general overview on the debate in Japan, see Béligh Elbalti, “Foreign Judgments Recognition and Enforcement in Civil and Commercial Matters in Japan”, Osaka University Law Review, Vol. 66, 2019,… [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 12:30 am
Such a provision would go against the high standards adopted by the ECtHR and the Council of Europe’s recommendations, which severely restrict the cases under which journalists can be compelled to reveal their sources (see for example the judgments in Voskuil v. the Netherlands and Sanoma Uitgevers B.V. v. the Netherlands). [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 9:01 pm
A trial court in New Jersey, however, held, in a 1976 case, M.T. v. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 5:07 pm
Steven G. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 3:38 pm
Pix credit here For those of you who have been following my step by step encounter with Jan Broekman's path-breaking book, Knowledge in Change: The Semiotics of Cognition and Conversation (Cham, Switzerland: Springer Nature, 2023), I am happy to announce that the entire work is now ready for review as a discussion draft.The abstract described my intentions: Humans create but do not regulate generative systems of data based programs (so-called… [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 7:41 pm
My article, "Transnational Corporations' Outward Expression of Inward Self-Constitution: The Enforcement of Human Rights by Apple, Inc." has just been published and will appear in the Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 20(2):805-879 (2013). [read post]
20 Mar 2016, 7:05 pm
The outside-in approach tends to reveal more about the foreign system projected inward and the extent of global harmonization, along with the character of that harmonization. [read post]
