Search for: "Hook, Appeal of" Results 1481 - 1500 of 2,284
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Apr 2012, 4:00 am by Charles Sartain
The lessee-defendant, the trial court, and the court of appeals said “Yes, but . . . [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 4:00 am by Charles Sartain
The lessee-defendant, the trial court, and the court of appeals said “Yes, but . . .”. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 6:04 pm by Jeffrey J. Randa
We're not talking blood pressure medication, or thyroid medication, or anything like that; we're talking about things like tranquilizers, painkillers, and psychotropic medications upon which people can become hooked. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 3:41 pm by David Kravets
" That means Google could be liable for wiretapping damages for secretly intercepting the data, a decision that Google is appealing. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 3:37 am by Russ Bensing
They don’t worry about that stuff in the courts of appeals, either, so let’s take a look to see what’s happened there… In State v. [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 10:37 am
A Nova Scotia lawyer is on the hook for $28,000 owed to a former client after the province’s court of appeal overturned a lower court ruling that found paid accounts were not subject to assessment.In a 3-0 decision in Mor-Town Developments Ltd. v. [read post]
8 Apr 2012, 9:28 pm by admin
Hunter, an award winning, certified meteorologist, claims the stations hired young, attractive females, instead of qualified males like himself, in an effort to hook more male viewers. [read post]
7 Apr 2012, 4:45 am by Walter Olson
“A woman whose fetus was stillborn cannot sue the doctor who performed an emergency Caesarian section in a futile attempt to save its life, an appeals court ruled. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 1:38 pm by Laura Orr
Oregonian article: "Oregon Court of Appeals says consumers with unpaid credit-card debt aren't off the hook unless six years have passed and no lawsuits are filed," by Aimee Green, The Oregonian, March 30, 2012, and Sunday, April 01, 2012. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 12:12 am by rquintilone
Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board and Rafael Rivas, the Court of Appeal for the Second Appellate District affirmed the WCAB’s denial of reconsideration of its determination of which party should bear the loss when a stolen check, with a forged indorsement, is cashed and the payee never receives the check. [read post]
31 Mar 2012, 8:24 am by Bridget Crawford
 Maybe that was the hook to get me to visit the site or blog about it. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 11:38 am by Kara M. Maciel
Strong, the Tennessee Court of Appeals relied on guidance found in the U.S. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 10:21 am by Kara M. Maciel
Strong, the Tennessee Court of Appeals relied on guidance found in the U.S. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 10:05 am by Ben Rubin
  The movie, besides receiving critical acclaim, had two hooks for me. [read post]