Search for: "Identive Group Inc."
Results 1481 - 1500
of 2,353
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Oct 2013, 7:46 am
Lower-level employees do not set policies for the entire company, but when high-level personnel exercise discretion, resulting decisions affect a much larger group. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am
When asked if he reviewed the identical [innovator drug] label before treating [plaintiff], [the prescriber] responded “not in detail, no. [read post]
8 Oct 2013, 5:01 pm
The evidence was that although Kennametal Technologies was a company within the Kennametal group, there had been no transfer of the opposition from Kennametal Inc. to Kennametal Technologies. [read post]
8 Oct 2013, 6:14 am
Escalante's Comida Fina, Inc. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 3:42 am
Logical Language Group, Inc., 22 USPQ2d 1532, 1534 (Fed. [read post]
6 Oct 2013, 10:50 pm
Pro Football, Inc. [read post]
2 Oct 2013, 9:00 am
Natural Provisions, Inc. agreed to pay $15,000 in civil penalties, an additional $15,000 in upgrades for its information technology systems, and to take the steps necessary to prevent future data breaches. [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 8:11 am
The Trial After the plaintiff settled with the hospital, the surgical group, and Dr. [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 8:11 am
The Trial After the plaintiff settled with the hospital, the surgical group, and Dr. [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 8:11 am
The Trial After the plaintiff settled with the hospital, the surgical group, and Dr. [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 8:11 am
The Trial After the plaintiff settled with the hospital, the surgical group, and Dr. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 7:05 pm
Liggett Group, Inc. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 3:04 am
TTABlog note: This article is "Copyright © 2013 Matthew Bender & Company, Inc., a member of the LexisNexis Group. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 9:53 am
Pfizer, Inc., 712 F.3d 21 (1st Cir. 2013), Aetna, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 6:52 am
Sun Fund IV owned 70% of Scott Brass, Inc. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 12:57 pm
Jude Medical, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 7:38 am
What exposes his permissive agenda is the passage on page 28 in which he disagrees with Judge Posner, or at least with the way he, I believe, misunderstands Judge Posner:"Some commentators and some courts reason that -- as a matter of contract -- the F/RAND commitment is an agreement that damages are adequate compensation for infringement and therefore an injunction should not be granted under the Supreme Court's standard in eBay Inc. et al. v. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 9:01 am
Medtronic, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Sep 2013, 6:55 pm
Marshall Thompson is the only surviving original member of the Chi-Lites, a rhythm-and-blues group from Chicago. [read post]
28 Aug 2013, 5:00 am
Wal–Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
