Search for: "JONES v. JONES" Results 1481 - 1500 of 9,903
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Apr 2011, 8:10 pm by Eugene Volokh
The judge [Mark Somers] then ordered the trial....I think requiring anything other than a modest, content-neutral permit fee would be unconstitutional, as the Court held in Forsyth County v. [read post]
24 Aug 2018, 3:21 pm by anbrandon
Take for example today's unpublished opinion in United States v. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 2:58 pm
Things like this always bother me.There's a contested criminal trial. [read post]
17 Dec 2021, 11:43 am by KLG PDF Import
Key Insight: Whether compelling the defendant to enter his cell phone password would violate his privilege against self incrimination under 5th Amendment and art. 12 of Mass Declaration of Rights Nature of Case: Trafficking a person for sexual servitude Electronic Data Involved: data held on cell phone Keywords: Cell phone password, 5th Amendment Identified State […] [read post]
11 May 2022, 12:30 pm
California prohibits the sale of semiautomatic rifles to anyone under 21. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 11:06 am
As is often the case after a long vacation, the Ninth Circuit returns from its hiatus with a vengeance. [read post]
8 Apr 2016, 1:43 pm
Here's a neat little case that might be of particular interest to readers in more rural areas. [read post]
4 Apr 2023, 4:13 pm
This seems to me to be largely a "forgot to put it on the record" problem.The judge dismissed the jury after it rendered its guilty verdict, but forgot that the jury hadn't yet decided whether the defendant had been previously convicted of a serious felony, which was one of the charged enhancements. [read post]
28 Dec 2010, 11:19 pm by pete.black@gmail.com (Peter Black)
Unlikely names of actual court cases, compiled by Rodney Jones and Gerald Uelmen in Supreme Folly (1990): Sand v. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 2:27 am
arstechnica: ACLU: "reasonable suspicion" not good enough for GPS tracking; Advocacy group files an amicus brief that could provide a follow-up to Jones by Cyrus Farivar: If you’re a student of the privacy and tech law worlds (or you just read Ars) then you’re probably familiar with last year’s Supreme Court decision, Jones v. [read post]