Search for: "JORDAN v. JORDAN" Results 1481 - 1500 of 2,438
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Aug 2022, 1:43 pm by Benjamin Pollard
ICYMI: Yesterday on Lawfare Jen Patja Howell shared the Lawfare Podcast in which Alan Rozenshtein sat down with Andrew Tutt to discuss the impact of Torres v. [read post]
21 Apr 2013, 3:20 pm
Life after L'Oréal is a topic that both Pail Jordan (Bristows) and Nicholas Saunders (Brick Court) will have a chance to reflect on. [read post]
20 Mar 2022, 1:36 pm by Katherine Pompilio
Orin Kerr analyzed an Eastern District of Virginia judge’s ruling in U.S. v. [read post]
10 May 2022, 11:18 am by Katherine Pompilio
The legislation was quickly passed in the wake of a leaked controversial draft decision indicating that the court could overturn the landmark abortion rights case Roe v. [read post]
23 Jul 2022, 9:51 am by Benjamin Pollard
Stewart Baker shared an episode of the Cyberlaw Podcast in which he sat down with Tatyana Bolton, Jamil Jaffer, and Megan Stifel to discuss the first Cyber Safety Review Board Report and other recent cybersecurity law developments: Howell shared an episode of the Lawfare Podcast in which Evelyn Douek and Jurecic sat down with Evan Greer to discuss the role of Section 230 protections on liability for speech about abortion post-Dobbs v. [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 10:15 am
Art & artifice's Rosie Burbidge pertinently asks "Is copyright in a 1980s Michael Jordan photo infringed by the Jumpman logo? [read post]
27 Jan 2018, 6:43 am by William Ford
Jordan Brunner summarized the Kaspersky Lab’s most recent filing against the Department of Homeland Security. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 1:44 pm by Mark Walsh
Jordan Lorence, a senior counsel with ADF, is seated in the public gallery. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 1:16 pm by Yishai Schwartz
In a 233-page blockbuster decision, Uri Avnery v. [read post]
31 Aug 2018, 9:01 am by Andrew Hamm
” Turning to cases in the pipeline, Jordan S. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 1:07 pm by Bexis
Aug. 24, 1990) (rejecting argument that defense expert should have been excluded for lack of certainty; “[r]easonable medical probability is for the fact finder to determine, and testimony regarding the possible causes of an injury is admissible”) (unpublished; applying Texas law); Jordan v. [read post]