Search for: "John Doe 2 " Results 1481 - 1500 of 12,117
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jan 2009, 5:57 pm by Michael Stevens
Blue Ridge Paper Products, Inc     Eastern District of Tennessee at Greeneville 08a0462p.06  John Doe v. [read post]
10 Nov 2008, 5:12 pm
Notes 1 John Ellis, colloquium talk, August 14, 2008, at elapsed time 1:57. 2 Id. at 54:35. 3 Id. at 56:16. 4 Id. at 56:00. 5 Id. at 62:31. [read post]
31 Jul 2008, 3:31 pm
The new Quinnipiac polls for Florida, Ohio and Pennsylvania are mostly encouraging for John McCain. [read post]
10 May 2014, 6:11 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
Elsea, Legislative Attorney; Michael John Garcia, Legislative Attorney. [read post]
13 May 2008, 3:10 pm
If John Chambers is the next John Chambers, who comes next? [read post]
13 May 2008, 3:10 pm
If John Chambers is the next John Chambers, who comes next? [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 10:00 am by Steven Cohen
John Jewell Aircraft, Inc – United States District Court – Western District of Kentucky – January 12th, 2016), the plaintiffs (Larry Crouch and Teddy Hudson) have filed a negligence lawsuit against the defendant (John Jewell Aircraft, Inc.) for negligence in relation to a plane crash in November 2006. [read post]
17 May 2007, 1:37 pm
He does not know anything about it and could not. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 2:49 pm by Eugene Volokh
John Doe P, John Doe Q, John Doe R, and John Doe S (collectively Does) sued to enjoin the county from releasing the records. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 2:04 am by John L. Welch
A blanket statement that all objections are renewed does not cut the mustard.TTABlog comment: Take a look at Applicant's brief (here) and see if you agree with the Board's ruling on the page limitations question.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 2:25 am by John L. Welch
" In sum, it concluded that the similarities in the marks outweigh their differences.And so the Board sustained the opposition.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
17 Jun 2008, 11:00 am
The fact that the letters in applicant's mark appear as De as opposed to the De displayed in registrant's mark does not diminish the similarity of the commercial impression engendered thereby. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 11:00 am
In this train wreck of a Section 2(d) proceeding, Opposer Life Zone Inc. failed to properly introduce its trademark registrations and failed to provide evidence establishing common law rights in its marks from a date prior to Applicant's filing date. [read post]