Search for: "Jones v. District Court"
Results 1481 - 1500
of 3,120
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Feb 2014, 6:00 am
In January 2012, the Supreme Court held in United States v. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 4:56 am
However, under the Supreme Court’s decision in Jones v RR Donnelley & Sons Co, race discrimination claims arising under the Civil Rights Act of 1991 were subject to a four-year statute of limitations pursuant to 28 U.S.C. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 6:36 am
Jones, 2005 WL 2284283 (U.S. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 7:46 pm
The defendants in the case of Professional Massage Training Center, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 7:00 am
The district court granted summary judgment in favor of Defendant and Plaintiff appealed. [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 11:43 am
The recent Ohio Supreme Court case of Jackson v. [read post]
2 Feb 2014, 11:36 pm
HA Jones Co.. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 4:00 am
On February 4, 2014, at 10:00 a.m. in Sacramento, the California Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Loeffler v. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 8:03 pm
Justice Sotomayor’s concurring opinion in United States v. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 6:22 am
’ Jones v. [read post]
26 Jan 2014, 6:00 am
Jones, 2014 U.S. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 7:16 am
At the time of sentencing, the district court believed the mandatory minimum for Appellant to be ten years. [read post]
8 Jan 2014, 3:29 pm
Jones v. [read post]
8 Jan 2014, 8:14 am
Her bar memberships include the American Bar Association, the New York State Bar, the District of Columbia Bar, and the United States Supreme Court Bar. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 2:21 pm
<> Jones v. [read post]
3 Jan 2014, 6:25 am
Race discrimination claims asserted against a restaurant chain by African-American individuals and their corporate entities under Section 1981 could proceed against the franchisor where the claims concerned potential contracts, a federal district court in Illinois ruled (Jones v Culver Franchising System, December 20, 2013, Durkin, T). [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 5:14 am
Though Jones v. [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 5:00 am
While no district court opinion represents the last word, the opinion by Judge Pauley deflates the overblown arguments made by metadata critics on the program’s efficacy, the quality of judicial and congressional oversight, and the continued vitality of the Supreme Court’s precedent in Smith v. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 4:39 am
The Court ruled in favor of the firm’s clients last summer, in Shelby County v. [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 5:00 am
Hardison v. [read post]
