Search for: "LJ"
Results 1481 - 1500
of 2,386
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 May 2017, 2:42 pm
Instead the Chamber concentrated its attention on two admittedly obiter statements, respectively by Hale LJ (as she then was) in the Court of Appeal in Adan, and Lord Millett in Runa Begum. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 10:14 am
This appeal is concerned solely with trade mark law ...'.Morritt LJ was willing to consider issues beyond registered trade mark law and concluded that Mr Presley's estate had no exclusive common law rights to the name of Elvis Presley. [read post]
2 Feb 2023, 1:03 pm
The first authority that is worth considering is the case of Re A (A Child) (Supervised Contact) (Section 91(14) Children Act 1989 Orders) [2021] EWCA Civ 1749, decided by King LJ, a judgment prepared just before the new s91A was about to come into force, but which dealt with the already changed landscape since Re P had been decided some 22 years prior. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 2:25 pm
However, given intervention by the EHRC in the case, the Court of Appeal in Moses LJ’s lead judgment decided to set out the correct approach to s.24C and s.24D. [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 10:59 pm
Gross LJ continued at paragraph 49: iv) There is not and cannot be any universal test for resolving when speech goes beyond legitimate protest, so attracting the sanction of the criminal law. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 5:58 am
The Government had already placed itself firmly behind Jackson LJ’s proposals for ending recoverability. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 4:00 am
What was the first redacted document generated by the Leveson Inquiry The Letter Of Appointment sent by Baroness Browning and the Rt Hon Jeremy Hunt MP to Leveson LJ on 28 July 2011. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 4:22 am
Ward LJ, giving the leading judgment made it clear that the courts were bound by the decision of the House of Lords in Campbell v MGN (No.2). [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 3:30 pm
”The Court of Appeal decision in Clue expressly concerned a scenario in whicha person is unlawfully present in the United Kingdom within paragraph 7 of Schedule 3 [to] the 2002 Act, and is destitute and would otherwise be eligible for services of a kind listed in paragraph 1 of Schedule 3” [Emphasis in judgment]But in this case, even if MK were lawfully present she would not be eligible for s.17 assistance, for the eases given earlier.For good measure, the High Court quotes Sedley… [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 3:30 pm
”The Court of Appeal decision in Clue expressly concerned a scenario in whicha person is unlawfully present in the United Kingdom within paragraph 7 of Schedule 3 [to] the 2002 Act, and is destitute and would otherwise be eligible for services of a kind listed in paragraph 1 of Schedule 3” [Emphasis in judgment]But in this case, even if MK were lawfully present she would not be eligible for s.17 assistance, for the eases given earlier.For good measure, the High Court quotes Sedley… [read post]
30 Nov 2021, 1:14 pm
As Peter Gibson LJ noted in Starmark, the Court has to seek to discern “the intention of the parties, viewed objectively, with the aid of the presumption”. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 7:15 am
He then summarised 3M’s position, which was that in the trial judgment, he (Michael Tappin QC) had established that the Patent as proposed to be amended was valid; that no further trial would be required and consequently there could be no abuse of process; and that the present case would fall into the category of being covered in the main litigation (another of the categories identified by Jacob LJ in Nikken). [read post]
25 Nov 2020, 4:02 pm
Warby J referred to his earlier explanation of the terms as: “This is a convenient shorthand way of referring to different levels of gravity, which derives from the judgment of Brooke LJ in Chase v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2003] EMLR 11 [45]. [read post]
15 Nov 2020, 6:55 am
This and the wording of s.204, to which Chadwick LJ and Judge Monty QC in Castro referred, indicate that once the authority fails to notify a review decision in time, but produces a late review decision, the applicant has a choice of an appeal against the original decision or the review decision but not both. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 4:10 am
There would have to be adequate signage - "prominent and clearly positioned and displayed" (per May LJ). [read post]
21 Jun 2022, 11:36 am
Arden LJ made the points I have cited in paragraph 29 above when explaining why the costs in question were not incidental to the recovery of rent. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 9:10 am
The judgment in the Court of Appeal was given by Nicola Davies LJ, with whom McCombe and Coulson LJJ agreed. [read post]
15 Dec 2018, 4:31 pm
However, Davis LJ went on to eviscerate the claim further. [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 7:15 am
The starting point for Mellor J’s analysis was Kitchin LJ’s judgment in Regeneron v Genentech [2013] EWCA Civ 93. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 10:56 pm
In the Court of Appeal, Laws LJ said no: breach of such a requirement would only make the detention unlawful if compliance was a condition of lawful detention. [read post]
