Search for: "MATTER OF B B J B"
Results 1481 - 1500
of 5,813
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jan 2020, 5:30 am
Dec. 17, 2019 Nealon, J.), the court addressed the issue of vicarious liability of a healthcare provider for punitive damages. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 1:58 am
Therefore, the decision could not stand, and the matters were reconsidered.Consent and second-hand salesBoth parties agreed that there was no express consent but the Applicant argued that there was implied consent (relimg on The Sunrider Corp v OHIM EU Case T-203/02 as establishing that implied consent would qualify). [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 6:49 am
On December 11, 2019, the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in the case of LRC Realty, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Jan 2020, 1:27 pm
J. [read post]
3 Jan 2020, 11:10 am
Chamber of Commerce As previously written about here, on December 30, 2019, District Judge Kimberly J. [read post]
3 Jan 2020, 11:10 am
Chamber of Commerce As previously written about here, on December 30, 2019, District Judge Kimberly J. [read post]
1 Jan 2020, 9:16 am
Clio – along with Rocket Matter, which launched soon after – was quixotic in its quest, lobbying lawyers to move their practices to the cloud at a time when lawyers literally feared the cloud. [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 6:56 am
Limbach, No. 1989-J-863 (June 28, 1991); Lyons v. [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 4:40 am
Cinemas cOULD now screen Cecil B. [read post]
28 Dec 2019, 3:22 am
[para 40]The fact that the colour red would be one of the several essential characteristics does matter, because (1) since the shape was not considered as the sole essential characteristic of the mark, it fundamentally defeated the invalidation grounds under s. 3(2)(a), (b) and (c) of the 1994 Act on the shape specific exclusions; and (2) it defined the sign at issue as not a 'colour per se' mark.[2] Is the colour ‘red’ defined with sufficient clarity and… [read post]
27 Dec 2019, 9:52 am
First, proximate harm is a 12(b)(6) issue and not a subject matter jurisdiction issue, per Lexmark. [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 8:11 am
Davis J. [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 2:00 am
Key Findings Thirty-four states have major tax changes taking effect on January 1, 2020. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 4:11 pm
His claims failed before MacMenamin J in the High Court and Baker J (Clarke CJ and Dunne J concurring) in the Supreme Court. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 9:41 am
BackgroundBack in December 2016, the parties first clashed in a two day trial before Arnold J (as he then was). [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 4:50 am
Charge two alleged that the respondent neglected a legal matter entrusted to him, in violation of rule 1.3(b) of the Rules of Professional Conduct (22 NYCRR 1200.0), as follows: Beginning in or about 2009, the respondent represented Louis Wenger (hereinafter Wenger) in two related judicial dissolution proceedings commenced by Wenger’s son, David Wenger (hereinafter David), entitled David Wenger v L.A. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 2:00 am
(b) Tax on interest and dividend income only. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 10:03 pm
The district judge referred the matter to a magistrate judge for an evidentiary hearing and a recommendation. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 10:02 pm
The Court suggests that Brulotte may not have been correct as an original matter, but declines to overrule this statutory decision. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 4:08 pm
Feeney J’s conclusions are also mistaken as a matter of EU law. [read post]
